Replies

Argee, this argument is just so disingenuous and so loaded with logical fallacies that I see I simply can't reason with you.

You've stated this as if someone wants to create an entirely homosexual society, which of course could not exist. But that's not at all what we're talking about and you know that. But to the extent that you're trying to misrepresent the facts simply to buttress an unsupportable premise, you're simply being outright dishonest.

We're talking about a pluralistic society in which the 2 to 5 percent of the population that is homosexual is allowed to live in peaceful coexistance with the rest of society. Their numbers are insignificant and have no impact on your life, my life, or the continuation or demise of our society. To argue otherwise is sheer unbridled demogoguery.

Please don't insult my intelligence and the rest of FR's intelligence by arguing some stupid hypothetical that does not, has not, and will never exist in the real world.

Only in theory do you begin to make any sense. Sadly, the theory is silly and so is your reasoning.

We're talking about a pluralistic society in which the 2 to 5 percent of the population that is homosexual is allowed to live in peaceful coexistance with the rest of society.

Do you think that homosexuals just want to be left in peace, or do you think that homosexuals want to indoctrinate children in schools, infiltrate religious organizations, political life, get more and more media attention, have huge municipal-funded "Gay Pride" parades, tax funded "Gay neighborhoods" replete with rainbow flags, change laws so that homosexuals of various stripes can come to work in full regalia and not be fired, change laws so that if a homosexual is assaulted or killed the punishment for the perp is more severe than if the perp had assaulted or killed a "regular" person, etc etc??? Please anwswer this.

You've stated this as if someone wants to create an entirely homosexual society, which of course could not exist. But that's not at all what we're talking about and you know that. But to the extent that you're trying to misrepresent the facts simply to buttress an unsupportable premise, you're simply being outright dishonest.

That's a very clever "as if" you stuck in there, only to go on and rebut something I have never said nor implied.

That 2% only wants to be left alone, you say. But their behavior doesn't support that. Once they learn they have been left alone, then they move on to defining a hate crime to think they are wrong. They move on to indoctrinate school children that anyone who thinks they are wrong are hateful. They move on to ask school children if they have ever wondered if they might be gay (I am not implying a predatory reason, just pointing out a fact) and encouraging youth to experiment at a time of well recognized sexual confusion.

There is a problem that needs addressing. It is not served by you making up comments that you can address while ignoring what I have actually said.

Can you give one good reason why we should change centuries of tradition and law to normalize homoerotic behavior? I'm only asking for one.

Shalom.