Replies

Oh, I'm laughing out loud now. That response to you was to counter your assertion that the study you were touting somehow should be considered more plausible than others - the very thing you falsely accused me of doing.

I've come to understand you have a reactive need to protest when you're shown to be wrong, but come on. Are you trying to convince me that you're completely incapable of an honest assertion?

That response to you was to counter your assertion that the study you were touting somehow should be considered more plausible than others - the very thing you falsely accused me of doing.

Nice try but it clearly shows how you said my DATA was wrong "thus shattering your risible argument and your DATA had a "higher correlation" was right. Even an eight year-old can see that.

So now that's settled let's go on to #2. He cites studies he won’t cite.

Why do you say there were other studies that support your conclusion but won't cite which studies they are?