Replies

I'm afraid that when we make the argument against special rights for gays, we fail to do so in a thoroughly intellectually honest way.

Then enlighten me; make the argument for special rights for a man who defines his raison d'etre, his entire existance by his preference to jam his penis into another man's anus or vice versa ? (Homosexualists define themselves by their sexual deviancy and politics and nothing, absolutely NOTHING else.)

I do sincerely believe it to be a genetic abnormality, which probably accounts for the bulk of cases, and the other is a dysfunctional environment.

That's fine. You can believe anything you like. Some believe the moon is made out of green cheese. You've offered absolutely NOTHING to substantiate your OPINION.

The latter might be able to be corrected, but the former most certainly can't. I'm rather dubious of when I hear about "former homosexuals", which probably means they were either bisexual to begin with or are now simply living in denial (think fmr. Congressman Mike Huffington).

So, you define what a former homosexualist is and then use that definition to substantiate your own claims. Again, its your OPINION and there is NOTHING in your statement to substantiate your claims.

In the case of genetic homosexuals, you can no more change your sexuality than someone mentally retarded can pretend to be a member of MENSA.

Introducing a NEW and IMPROVED (is it lemon scented?) term to define homosexualism (genetic homosexuality) is a sham. Invoking the name of a bunch of phoney navel gazers who claim to be superior to others (I turned down their invitation to join after solving serveral of their childish puzzles) to bolster your point, is lame. The Cult Of The Anus along with LEFTIST sympathizers have political aspirations. Unable to reproduce, they seek to recuit. That is the only way homosexualists can survive.