[Jim Noble]

The central element of most male homosexual relationships is "cruising." The opposite is stable heterosexual marriage. The latter is the foundation of societies that prosper, the former is the bane of civilizations and always attendant upon their decline.

Correct in part.

"Cruising" is the central element of ALL unregulated sexual behavior, male and female, heterosexual and homosexual.

Heterosexual marriage is a social convention which meets the needs of pregnant women and small children, and it IS the foundation of and stable and healthy society.

But now that we have institutionalized "gay sex" for straights (divorce, remarriage, multiple partners, adultery, getting Lewinskys everywhere you go), it seems a bit mean-spirited to deny it to its pioneers.

Gays and their sex lives aren't doing any more to destroy society than straights are doing by themselves.

[AmericanVictory]

Not true. While this argument is often seized upon by homosexual propagandists it is not accurate. Even in the worst days of sexual laxity in U.S. society, the percentage of male homosexuals who practice anything close to monogamy is tiny, less than 10%, while the percentage of hetorosexual marrieds doing the same is on the order of far better than 50%. The difference is the stability of our civilization.

Further, it is misleading to speak of these things as if they were recent developments when in fact they go back far beyond biblical times. And America, on the whole, has been far more inclined to faithful hetorosexual married life than most other societies. Indeed one of the most amusing parts of this propaganda of the homosexuals is the implication that sodomy and its associated acts are "modern" as if invented contemporeously with, let us say, the transistor. Now you wish to extend this same misleading insinuation to hetorosexaul unfaithfulness.