Replies

You were also the first to say that this "tragedy" was being used for propaganda purposes. I take issue that your choice of word to describe what happened a "tragedy" when what happened was a crime, pre-meditated, not an accident.

You made the comparison of the using the "evil" deed for political gain. The implication that one act was no different than the other.

Method of Operation - Change the subject - homosexuals to heterosexual abuse. Compare race to homosexuals. Then you insult intelligence by saying that this was a propaganda for political gain.

Equate racism and anti-semitism to homosexuality, now after using that comparison claim that you don't care about "hate speech" TWISTED. For what purpose did you choose those words?

I guess without knowing it you made the point that concerns me. "It may make news in locales in which the crimes have occurred" "too many cases of child molestations going on to make a national issue of each one, unfortunately".

Yet when it gets posted here you claim it is being used for propgranda purposes for political gain.

Your own words speak to the method of operation. As I said before I could care less what you choose to do in private. You have not kept "you private" and what I do in private is no one elses business so I have not made the manner in which someone does sex the issue.

So you are gay, what does that have to do with this story. You seem to think that what you choose is relevant to the story and set about making "THAT" the issue not about a "crime wave".

Are you somehow saying that the purpose of this article is to shed light on molestations? Or do you think (as I do) that this has a definite "look what the homos are up to" flavor?

I haven't tried at all to change the subject. Just trying to illustrate that while I think what these men have done deserves the harshest punishments available, the subtext of this article is clearly that homosexuals in general are a problem, and it was written to reinforce that idea in peoples' heads.

For instance, if I wrote an article that gave the details of a number of black on white rapes and titled it "Black rapes continue", you would probably suspect my motives.

As for my choice of words... if I say 9/11 was a tragedy, will you take issue because what happened was a crime, pre-meditated, and not an accident? You're really reaching.

I missed this earlier...

"You have not kept "you private" and what I do in private is no one elses business so I have not made the manner in which someone does sex the issue."

If you notice, I never mentioned my sex life. Nor do I intend to.

"So you are gay, what does that have to do with this story."

Nothing. Another poster asked if I was gay. That's how it came up. I get the feeling you haven't read the entire thread.