Yeah.. I agree. My initial thinking was that I would rather not have people accusing me of using the forum to post sexually explicit things. My plate is full as it is in here. But what the hell... ;-)
"But you are wrong: a heterosexual male will never have his prostate jabbed by his wife's genitals. Devices don't count."
Well.. maybe not by her genitals, but it does happen. Even if devices don't count, you still have to admit that anal sex occurs between men and women. Therefore, it is not an act exclusively reserved for homosexuals.
"Also, your statement "the only difference being that their partner is of same gender" attempts to imply that the gender of the participants is a trivial matter."
I'm attempting to imply no such thing. I've often seen it posted on FR that homosexuals are disgusting because of their engagement in anal sex and other less common things as well.. but all these acts are engaged in by heterosexuals too. Their points are all I'm trying to address... preemptively, maybe.
"Most here would asert that the gender of the participants is a primary defining aspect in the nature of an act. "
Sure.. but it doesn't change the fact that heterosexuals and homosexuals are engaging in the same acts.
"So a woman doing something with a woman is never "exactly the same thing" as a man performing a similar act with a woman. Likewise male/male. "
It's also not the same on a person to person basis. I see what you're saying, but I stand by my original statement.
No, two acts with different primary defining aspects are two different types of acts.
By definition, people of opposite sexes cannot possibly perform homosexual acts on eachother.
To accept a statement that they are the the same or even equivalent is to implicitly accept that sexuality is not an intrinsic part of a sex act. I don't accept that.
One has the POSSIBILITY for procreation and one doesn't, dirt babies don't count.