I won't go into this on the forum, but I can explain this very easily in mail if you would like. Again... homosexuals engage in NO ACTS that heterosexuals do not ALSO engage in.. the only difference being that their partner is of same gender.
"How did it come to pass that a seemingly intelligent person like yourself could formulate, type and post a succinct statement that is so blatantly self-refuting without recognizing the obvious?"
First of all, thanks for the compliment. ;-) The reason I could post what I did is that it is true.
"Could your perspective on this matter be corrupt?"
I don't think it is, no.
(snipping the "opportunity" bits)
It was NOT specious. Yes of course things take place when there is opportunity.. but you are ignoring my point about the opportunity that priests do NOT have. Priests do NOT have the opportunity to molest girls for the simple reason that most parents wouldn't leave their girls alone with an older male. You would see molestations of girls much more often by priests if they had access. This is why it seems to be a "homosexual" pedophilia problem... not because homosexuals are more likely to be predators, but because priests have altar boys and not altar girls.
"Maybe if we keep homosexuals away from children, there will be no opportunity for a public "misunderstanding" of their behavior."
That's one way of guaranteeing your children will not be molested by homosexuals. Keeping them away from heterosexuals will guarantee they not be molested by them, either. Statistically, you've got a much greater chance of running into the "heterosexual" variety. I suggest constant vigilance when your children are around adults, and eliminating situations in which they are alone with adults.
Thank you for a nice post. Civility has suffered of late. ;-)
First, this place is not as prudish as it's detractors would like to portray it. As long as you're not too graphic, gratuitous or abusive I doubt anyone will object to you making a salient point, even if it involves an idea that most of us don't like. Of course, I don't speak for the management.
But I don't think you have to, I get your point. But you are wrong: a heterosexual male will never have his prostate jabbed by his wife's genitals. Devices don't count. Also, your statement "the only difference being that their partner is of same gender" attempts to imply that the gender of the participants is a trivial matter.
Most here would asert that the gender of the participants is a primary defining aspect in the nature of an act. So a woman doing something with a woman is never "exactly the same thing" as a man performing a similar act with a woman. Likewise male/male.
BWAHAHAHA….
Again... homosexuals incestuals engage in NO ACTS that heterosexuals do not ALSO engage in.. the only difference being that their partner is of same gender.
Again... homosexuals bestials engage in NO ACTS that heterosexuals do not ALSO engage in.. the only difference being that their partner is of same gender.
Again... homosexuals pedophiles engage in NO ACTS that heterosexuals do not ALSO engage in.. the only difference being that their partner is of same gender.