[First Amendment]

However, this article is basically a vehicle for anti-homosexual propaganda masquerading as concern for sexual abuse victims. Nice example of using tragedy for political gain.

How is reporting the truth about homosexual child molesters propaganda???? In fact this is almost a puff piece since none of the statistics showing that homosexuals are much more likely to molest boys than heterosexual men are to molest girls are presented.

In fact, since most of the news media, "entertainment" industry (as though they were different) and gov't school including universtities are pushing homosexuality down peoples' throats literally and figuratively, I question your use of the words "anti-homosexual propaganda".

[Qwerty]

Look.. you may not like homosexuality, and that's fine. This article has nothing to do with a great homosexual conspiracy to shove homosexuality down anyone's throat. It has to do with how some pedophiles that should be in jail for life abused children. The children are of the same gender as the abuser, so it's labeled "homosexual"... but that's ridiculous. I never think of "heterosexual" pedophilia as heterosexuality... or representative of most heterosexuals.

I think the purpose of this article is clear. It uses some horrible examples of child abuse to create anger at homosexuals.

Reading this article made me sad and angry... and especially disheartened that the system let a monster like Gary Radloff free to commit the exact same crimes again. But aside from this, it also saddens me that there are people who feel most homosexuals are like Radloff. Articles like this are written for the purpose of reinforcing these beliefs.