Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks
You cling to an outdated DSM. You feel it was removed as a pathology for political reasons, and someday the APA may change their decision, but for the moment at least (and possibly permanently), your position is the outdated one. Until science agrees with you, you shouldn't bother bringing up DSM II.
190 posted on 02/26/2003 6:33:26 AM PST by Qwerty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: Qwerty
Until science agrees with you, you shouldn't bother bringing up DSM II.But the science does agree with me…POLITICS is not SCIENCE.
193 posted on 02/26/2003 6:37:39 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

To: Qwerty
You cling to an outdated DSM. You feel it was removed as a pathology for political reasons, and someday the APA may change their decision, but for the moment at least (and possibly permanently), your position is the outdated one. Until science agrees with you, you shouldn't bother bringing up DSM II.

APA...Pseudo-science is more like it. Just because someone "feels" its not a disorder does not make it so. Biological function determines it in this case. You need help.

258 posted on 02/28/2003 3:26:58 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson