Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mark
Why doesn't CA build several giant water treatment plants and convert ocean water to drinking water? I'm sure there are small plants that are used for that but obvioulsy not enough or "Aqua Duck" would be out of a job. That seems to be a task CA should invest in rather than new ways to conserve. Without water the rest won't matter much.
4 posted on 01/01/2003 4:27:35 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Dutch Boy
California does not have a water shortage--it has the largest water supply in the world, the Pacific Ocean. What California actually has is a salt surplus.

They are starting to move ahead with desalination plants now.

8 posted on 01/01/2003 5:10:05 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Dutch Boy
"That seems to be a task CA should invest in rather than new ways to conserve."

Faced with the same problem, Texas would be aggressively pursuing desalinization -- probably nuclear desalinization plants -- in order to maintain growth and keep improving the standard of living.

But we're talking about California here. They just don't think that way...

9 posted on 01/01/2003 5:21:34 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Dutch Boy
Water is a public good. Reservoirs, lakes and streams are good for the public. Constitutionally citizens can use lakes, reservoirs and streams for their own water needs, recreation and fishing. Corporate control of systems and delivery is bad. They do not allow historical public use of water. They can price water out of the reach of many consumers. They can control who gets it.
18 posted on 01/01/2003 9:35:01 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson