Where I grew up, that would be standard proceedure.
If you're a queer and go after a 12 year-old boy, you are a pedophile.
If you're a queer priest and not touching under-aged kids you're just a faggot priest.
Tell me, yendu bwam, how do you know if a man or woman is a queer unless they tell you? You can't.
Go to the Castro District in San Francisco and see if you can't tell who's queer and who's not.
Yeah, you're partly right on the first point, johnny7. My sons know exactly what to do in such a situation (and they are black belts in karate as well). But here's what happens in a lot of cases - and this is exactly what happened in my sons' Catholic elementary school - about 10 years ago. A homosexual priest got to know the parents of six teenage boys really well - to the point where the parents considered him a good friend. He had the boys spend a lot of time with him at the rectory, where they formed a little club. The parents, who were overjoyed at the priest's attention, told the boys to respect and obey the priest. The priest taught them to respect and obey him as well. He told the boys (who didn't know much about sex) that he had been put in charge of teaching them about sex, and helping them on into manhood. He showed them homosexual pornographic films. He got them to masturbate with him. The priest told them that this was completely normal, and that their fathers were proud of them, but that they should never talk about this stuff. They proceeded on into other depraved sexual activities until the priest was anally raping them about every other week for over six years. All the while, the boys believed this was normal and/or required. - You can see how insidious this was. The abuser often spend months and years setting up teenage boys to become their sex playthings - using them like rags. - Finally, I'd note that for parents who are too naive to warn their boys about such, some organizations, like the Boy Scouts, have kids watch films about the dangers of homosexual molestation. The difference is, the Boy Scouts put kids first. My Church puts kids last.
True, but a heck of a lot of faggot priests have sexual attractions to teenage boys. I don't want my sons in the presence of priests who have a sexual attraction for them (whether acted on or not). I don't want my sons taught about Catholic sexual morality by priests who have a serious sexual disorder. I want normal men for priests with whom we can have trust when they are around our sons.
Well, in the Catholic Church, you have seminaries full of priest candidates who sleep with each other at night. That would be a clue. YOu have priests who frequent gay bars and go on gay cruises. That would be a clue, yes? My bishop, Frank Rodimer, invited his best friend (a priest) to his beach home every summer. The friend brought along a teenage boy who slept in his room every night. Of course, Rodimer couldn't figure out that his friend was homosexual, even while the boy was being molested in his own house night after night. C'mon. Priests spend years in all male seminaries before becoming priests. If they can control themselves well enough over all those years so that no one knows they're homosexual, OK. But that would be like being a (normal) man in a dorm full of girls for several years. Do you think most men could do that without the girls finding out the man was a healthy normal heterosexual male? I don't. The Church should minister to homosexuals with love and compassion. They should NOT be priests.