Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madg
First, I’m not sure what you mean by “gay activists” since that term has been applied by some to anyone that is not stridently antigay.

Are you telling me you don't have the preceptive powers to tell? Then I guess you are admitting you are an imbecile.

Your practice of clear accusatory language when referring to your opponents and obfuscating when describing your compadres is a good strategic debating tool. But it doesn't fool me.

But even among those that can genuinely be called “gay activists,” I don’t see any orchestrated attempt to imply that Phelps is representative of anyone aside from himself. So if you’re suggesting that Phelps is used in an organized attempt at “Christian-bashing,” then I must say “no.” I don’t think that mainstream “gay activists” do that.

This is from a synopsis of an extensive series of Topeka Capital-Journal articles about "Rev." Phelps.

Read on and learn.


For conservative Christians, Phelps is a pitiful caricature of the believer who fosters negative stereotypes of Christians who oppose the homosexual lifestyle.

To gay activists, he is the far end of a spectrum of conservative Christians who fuel hate crimes with their anti-gay rhetoric.

"If you scratch away at the compassionate ex-gay campaign, you're going to find out all these flowers came from the same seeds," says Cathy Renna, director of community relations for the Washington-based Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. "Homophobia is homophobia is homophobia."

(snip)

[Robert] Knight [author of the overwhelmingly approved Definition of Marriage Amendment in California] complains, the media use Phelps as "a shorthand description of conservative Christians, which is unfair."

Renna agrees with Christian conservatives that Phelps is unique, but only because he expresses the hatred other groups couch in less incendiary language.

Even milder attacks on homosexuality, gay rights groups charge, can foment violence against the gay community, a suggestion that incenses Knight.

"It's an outrageous falsehood," he says, "that's been the same plan from day one of the Matthew Shepard tragedy: to say that any opposition to homosexual activity or any restatement of Biblical beliefs is a form of hate-filled bigotry that can lead directly to crimes of this type."

Such equations, he says, "are an attempt to restrict the free speech of conservative Christians. The gays are in effect saying we're going to shut you up by falsely blaming this murder on you."


The aforementioned Cathy Renna is the GLAAD attack dog who urged her fellow Gay-stapo members to pressure journalists not to seek comments in the name of "balance" from people opposed to their agenda.

You want more? Here's LGNY's Troy Masters (seriously), who slyly suggested that if Dr. Laura's TV show were allowed on the air, we might see more brutal homophobic killings.

136 posted on 12/18/2002 4:01:42 PM PST by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: L.N. Smithee; scripter
BTTT
137 posted on 12/18/2002 4:04:20 PM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson