Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan
The latest successor to the See of Canterbury has so far said that while his own personal philosophies are definitely left of center, he recognizes that his new position requires him to try to keep the Anglicans together in a collegial fashion, rather than try to lead them in a direction that he'd like to see them go. So I expect to see him condemn this act.

OTOH, he's not a Pope. He can advise, and if he condemns this act it will help satisfy the African Anglicans (as well as the ECUSA, which has so far not favored legitimizing such a ceremony). However, the next step belongs to whoever the Primate of Canada is. He or she may have the power to initiate disciplinary action against this Bishop, depending on what Canon Law is in Canada.

13 posted on 12/15/2002 6:27:45 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RonF
However, the next step belongs to whoever the Primate of Canada is. He or she may have the power to initiate disciplinary action against this Bishop, depending on what Canon Law is in Canada.

Maybe the power, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any disciplinary action to happen here......

22 posted on 12/15/2002 8:38:23 PM PST by Ryle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RonF
…ECUSA, which has so far not favored legitimizing such a ceremony).

Have you ever read the minutes from the 1998 Lambeth Conference ? There are many resolutions, though not Canon law, that indeed favor the perversion of homosexuality.

…depending on what Canon Law is in Canada.

I didn’t know Canon law is by sovereignty, I think you are mistaken.

23 posted on 12/15/2002 9:46:26 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson