Posted on 12/12/2002 5:40:27 AM PST by FormerLib
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:59:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
"Stevie" isn't like other 5-year-old boys. While his peers are into karate and video games, Stevie tiptoes around the house like a ballerina and plays with Barbie dolls. His favorite colors are pink and red.
The psychiatric world calls this behavior sex nonconformity or sex confusion.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
If you weren't a fool, you'd realize that feminine means having female qualities. It doesn't mean the same as female. You're trying to make the "feminine gender" be equivalent to the "female sex" and it just ain't the same.
Go listen to your George Michael CD's! 
Not at all. They are saying that a male child that prefers dressing Barbies in women's clothing to other types of play may have a problem that warrants investigation.
Oh please, I have heard hundred of pointee heads tell me sexual behavior is all genetics. We are simple creatures with no free will.
That's more evidence than shows that sexual orientation is genetics, but that hasn't stopped that myth from being pushed. Since 'sexual orientation' is impossible to define, it is makes it impossible to prove it has changed. How many women does a guy have to sleep with to prove he is no longer 'gay'? There are guys that go on to live normal lives after being 'gay', but do they ever get rid of all their sexual fantasies? Probably not. A guy may hate his ex-wife, but he still might fantasize about her at times. Medical schools teach that everybody is gay to a certain level, and they push a scale from 1-6. We will never solve the genetics vs. environment debate in any behavior, but there should be no debate that both are factors. Does therapy change behavior? Of course it does.
So the gay-activists define 'sexual orientation' based on 'feelings'. What a definitive definition. Just how does an ex-gayer prove his feelings to the gay-activists? Again, it is impossible. The gay-activists position is ridiculous. The position of the 'ex-gay industry' is based on definable behavior.
Could it be considered wrong to put a bridge together using two bolts, two nuts? Same thing with putting a society together using two males or two females. 
That ain't the half of it!
I understand that Dr. Spitzer did a study earlier this year confirming it. 
Your welcome.
Sex is the most selfish act of all; to confuse this with love is a problem for both straight and queer immature people.
Homosexual activity is still a major health risk despite all the cautions of a concerned core group of professionals and advocates of those who suffer the consequences of STD's.
It is the politics of "queerism" that sours the stomache.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.