I enjoy the reading of your post, robertpaulsen. You do put a lot of thought into all of these things. I am just wondering to myself if it is so wise to try to gain back all that was taken away incrementally with just one landmark blockbusting case. It is like putting all of your ducks into one big sack, or whatever that old saying is. Your way seems to go for all or nothing. Maybe you have to get back incrementally what was lost incrementally.
Oh, I agree with you. It is risky. But that's exactly what they're talking about doing, now that the 9th and 5th are disagreeing.
It appears that the decission will be limited to whether the 2nd amendment refers to the individual or not. That is, of course, a major decision in and of itself.
The other issues I mentioned will have to wait.