Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: strela
9th Circuit. Right. Why don't they stick to cases they are more familiar with. Like the right to bugger your fellow man in a gay bathhouse.
4 posted on 12/05/2002 2:37:49 PM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Bluntpoint
...which right they, doubtless, do believe can be found somewhere in the Constitution.
5 posted on 12/05/2002 2:43:38 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Bluntpoint
Worse, its Reinhardt in the 9th circuit. He's the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional judge.
24 posted on 12/05/2002 3:26:12 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Bluntpoint
Hey, IMO, the 9th Circuit just did us a big favor - they are gonna force SCOTUS to take on this case and overturn the ruling, thereby establishing precedent that the 2nd A does in fact confer individual rights. Had the 9th Circuit come up with a blander way to impose gun control viewpoints, SCOTUS could have just deflected the issue away like they are prone to do with 2nd A cases.
45 posted on 12/06/2002 7:19:36 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Bluntpoint
Oh, so you want to keep the gays limited to screwing in bathouses, eh? You Bigot! </sarcasm, for the sarcasm impaired>
59 posted on 12/06/2002 11:25:48 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Bluntpoint
Michael Savage? is that you?
72 posted on 12/09/2002 3:21:59 AM PST by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson