Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cinFLA
I've got a question for you based upon your contention that someone is erroneous in his/her assumptions and ignorant of the facts. I agree with you that people ignorant of facts and/or erroneous in assumption should not get much in the way of credibility.

My question is based upon your statement.

If someone, espousing your side of this issue, was erroneous in his/her assumptions and ignorant of the facts in a specific situation would you have the same contempt as you show toward those who have the opposite position of you with this issue???

324 posted on 11/14/2002 10:51:28 AM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
If someone, espousing your side of this issue, was erroneous in his/her assumptions and ignorant of the facts in a specific situation would you have the same contempt as you show toward those who have the opposite position of you with this issue???

I disagree with anyone that posts false information, however, my time is limited and I reserve my posts for those that portray smoking in a positive manner.

326 posted on 11/14/2002 11:11:55 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson