Roe v. Wade invented a "Constitional right" to commit abortions out of thin air. The contention that there is a "Constitutional right" to manufacture, sell and use illicit drugs invents such a "right" out of smoke.
Apples and oranges. The former "right" is wielded against state sovereignty; the latter right is (usually) not. (The latter is also firmly grounded in the plain text of the Constitution, unlike the former.)
Not at all. R-v-W, in effect, told states to obey the 14th amendment in the writing of abortion law. Outright prohibition of abortion was declared unconstitutional for a number of specified reasons. - Read it.
The contention that there is a "Constitutional right" to manufacture, sell and use illicit drugs invents such a "right" out of smoke.
Cut out the word "illicit", and the idiocy of your position is apparent. - Obviously there is a right to make, sell & use drugs. There has never been a granted power to ANY level of government to prohibit such activites.
- Drugs can be regulated, using constitutional laws and enforcement, as per the 14th. They can not be prohibited, as the act of prohibition violates other basic constitutional rights.