Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
It is the American way. Your in denail that this trend can be reversed. Its a done deal.

That may be the case, but I believe the general theme of this thread is “what should be,” and not “what is,” in regards to smoking laws. Smoking bans may be a “done deal,” but that does not make them practical or moral.

The major chains want the laws changed and the end result will be increased profits for everyone in the business because maintaining the staffing and the equipemt for providing smoking and nonsmoking sections will be eliminated and with a state wide ban the income will remain the same.

If it will lead to increased profits for everyone in the business, why must the government be involved? Can’t the owners simply ban smoking in their own restaurants?

Of course, the truth is not everyone will benefit from this law. In some establishments, smokers may make up a considerable portion of the customers. A smoking ban will weaken or eliminate these establishments. The major chains are using the power of government to eliminate competition. Do you not think that is wrong, and against the free-market system our country is supposed to have?

144 posted on 10/02/2002 5:20:09 PM PDT by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: timm22
If it will lead to increased profits for everyone in the business, why must the government be involved? Can’t the owners simply ban smoking in their own restaurants?

The economics only works when there is a region wide ban so that the owner doesn't need to compete with smoking restaurants.

Of course, the truth is not everyone will benefit from this law. In some establishments, smokers may make up a considerable portion of the customers. A smoking ban will weaken or eliminate these establishments.

Not if there is an accross the board ban.

The major chains are using the power of government to eliminate competition. Do you not think that is wrong, and against the free-market system our country is supposed to have?

I never like it when the larger players run rough shod over the smaller players but that is how our system works. They larger more successful restuarants may be able to excersize more clout than a small restauraunt but the bottom line is that even the small guy is going to have better profits when there is an effective regional ban. So, its not likely that the owner, who is in business to make money, is going to be upset when the larger players get a rule set whereby the industry as a whole makes more money. That is pure common cents.

192 posted on 10/03/2002 6:42:41 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson