Oklahoma City was most certainly an Iraqi operation. Clinton, the Justice Department, the FBI, not only knew, they covered it up. They are responsible for what happened on 9/11.
Which, I submit, is why there has been no desire on the part of the Bush administration or the Ashcroft justice department to push this. IMHO, there are three reasons why the Iraqi connection with 9/11 has been made by them:
Reason #1: If you recall in the first few weeks after 9/11, there were many angry (and rightfully so) people who wanted Bush to order a nuclear strike at whoever was responsible. For my money, that's what we have nuclear weapons for...the "Don't f*** with us!" doctrine. Had Iraq been officially and immediately linked with OKC in 1995 and WTC in 1993, the link with 9/11 would have been easy. Blood calls out for blood, and I don't think there would have been enough police in DC to contain the crowds on Pennsylvania Avenue carrying "NUKE IRAQ, NOW!" plackards.
Reason #2: If anyone thought that the Phoenix Memo caused heads to roll at the FBI, CIA and justice department, that would look like an ice cream social compared to the number of oxes that would be gored in DC. The people who convieniently swept this under the rug are still all over those agencies. These are also the same people who know where all of the bodies are buried in all three branches of government, and if they go down, they will take a lot of people in all three branches down with them. Imagine every political scandal of the past 40 years...now imagine them all hitting at once. Investors who bought into futures of tar and feathers would make a fortune. It would be UGLY! Entertaining....but ugly.
Reason #3: If Saddam Hussain is tied to all three terrorist attacks, all taking place AFTER the Gulf War, guess who's going to get the blame for not taking him out when we had the tanks in position to roll into Bagdad? Bush-41, Colen Powell, Dick Cheney and probably everyone short of Schwartzkopf. Who wants to give Terry McCauliff THAT kind of ammo?