Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: breakem
It was the 1150s-1200s before the europeans had enough food and heat to sustain large populations.

Around there I woulds imagine. In the Domesday Book the town that my family originated in had a population of 250, that was in 1068, in 1279 the population was about 1500 with about the same area.

I do think though that small pox was a symptom of decline reather than a cause.

33 posted on 09/04/2002 10:11:06 PM PDT by Little Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Little Bill
The author made a good case that the better diet and the clearing of forest land for agriculture which may be seen as signs of progress actually contributed to the spread of the plague. I don't know if the same is true of small pox.

Listened to an author of a book on small pox in the US and seemed to spread as different people came into contact with each other. The English or the French gave it to the Indians. It spread across the plains and some plains Indians gave it to the Spanish in New Mexico when they took other Indians there to sell them as slaves. Another aside: Geo Washington had the Americans innoculated against small pox after some British prisoners came up with it. Maybe the most significant strategic move of the war, at least right up there with the French Navy blocking the harbbor at Yorktown.

73 posted on 09/05/2002 12:48:31 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson