To: stalin
It was pretty obvious even before the nomination that he didn't stand a chance. Then why has Simon led in 9 out of 11 polls? Then why can't the all powerful Davis come close to 50% in the polls?
Don't even bother responding. You don't have a reasonable answer.
20 posted on
08/09/2002 10:12:40 AM PDT by
Coop
To: Coop
Don't listen to the media listen to what is said - Bush said he doesn't pay attention to polls. He will support Simon based on who Simon is as a person and good candidate! Don't be FOOLED by the media...
To: Coop
I can see why you don't want me to respond. You belief that Simon stands a snowballs chance in hell of winning is pretty silly. Sure he could win if Davis is found out to be some kind of mass murdering child molester before and election but otherwise Simon was dead in the water even before the financial scandals. Now he is as toasted as toasted could be.
I don't want Davis to win. That's why I think it was very stupid to nominate Someone like Simon. He isn't centrist enouph. Even Ronald Reagan was pro-choice when he was governor of California. It doesn't mater what your position on abortion is. It's simple politics. Now CA is even more pro-choice ; and Simon is anti-abortion ? That's only the tip of the iceburg. With all of the other issues combined Simon represents about 2% of the population of CA. Anything over that will be an anti-Davis vote not a pro-Simon one. That's not enouph for Davis to loose.
24 posted on
08/12/2002 1:22:36 PM PDT by
stalin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson