I have never said I need a candidate who agrees with me a 100%. In case you have a short-term memory, I want candidates to be honest. Don't tell me you like small govt and then boast to be a national school principal. Don't tell me you want to reduce the size of the govt, and then increase govt size to the largest level in American history. Don't tell me that you are against govt spending, and then spend 2 trillion dollars when eveyr household has to cut its budget. Don't tell me that you will defend political free speech with your life ("Over my dead body..blah blah blah"), and then turn around and sign the most blatant un-Constitutional bill ever. Don't tell me that you oppose stem-cell research, and then use aborted baby parts to carry out such things. Why couldn't he tell who he really is? In case you do not give me the same old tripe again, I want candidates to be honest and they do not have to agree with me a 100%. You can say that one more time. Oh, who am I kidding, your reply will somehow say it.
And please do not give me the ICC crap. Senate would never pass such a treaty. Are you sure about Kyoto? His EPA thinks differently. You got a tax-cut? You must be on welfare, that you thought your 600 dollar refund was a tax-cut. The people who voted for him will not see it until 2005, and it will vanish when he loses in 2004.
The people who voted for him will not see it until 2005, and it will vanish when he loses in 2004. Uh the truth finally comes out. Oh well I do not think that your prognotication will come true, I sincerely beleive that many voters have learned their lesson with Perot in 92, although that won't stop you from trying to get a demo President through the back door.
You don't know what was in that tax cut package ; just admit it. Once again, you have posted incorrect info.