To: terilyn
Bull! I was on that thread and you are a liar "I guess you're calling the Admin Moderater a liar too then. Here is a quote from an AM post about the incident:
"Regarding the posting of personal information, that shouldn't have been done and a suspension was given. That said, there is no question that the poster in question had said he was going to post some proof, and the injured party had pretty much said go ahead. This may have been misconstrued as permission to post what he did. In any case, it was against the forum guidelines, the post removed, and a suspension given."
130 posted on
08/04/2002 10:21:06 PM PDT by
kcpopps
To: kcpopps
Keep reading. The point is that permission to post was granted. However, the discussion about voting was clearly about a Larry Klayman/Judicial Watch poll. It was a JW press release thread.
Therefore, Registered asking her if she voted, and her reply, could only have been construed by anybody reading the actual thread as a discussion as to whether she voted in the LK/JW poll.
Reg pulled real voting registrations and posted them. That was not what the discussion was about. And, permission to post personal info re actual voting registrations was not given by Howlin, nor by the other people who's records he posted.
137 posted on
08/04/2002 10:28:29 PM PDT by
terilyn
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson