Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Jones
They were given this story by someone.

That'd be my guess. The story is the story! Where'd it come from; who, what, why... The piece rings too true to have been cut from whole cloth, but I've been fooled a time or two. Motivation? Who stands to gain most from these apparent revelations? I don't know, but there's probably some conspiracy types that could come up with something.

FGS

30 posted on 07/31/2002 11:50:20 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake
Where'd it come from; who, what, why... The piece rings too true to have been cut from whole cloth... motivation?

This looks like a White House shot across the Rat's bow. Let's see if there is a diminuation of the Rat's smear campaigns.

32 posted on 08/01/2002 12:14:58 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: ForGod'sSake
Who stands to gain most from these apparent revelations?

The Oklahoma City bombing victims and their families.

43 posted on 08/01/2002 5:20:04 AM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones; ForGod'sSake
They want to create the image that OK City and 911 are linked to discredit those who point out how our government has lied about OK City and to draw attention away from the lies they told.

The lies are getting thin and shaky and we all want to believe it was A-rab terrorists anyway. (Not to mention several ME groups tried to take credit for OKC but that info. was stifled at the time. Why?)

Motivation? Who stands to gain most from these apparent revelations?

Hmmmm, who indeed? It's interesting that the government prosecuters aren't interested in using this info. to tie Moussaoui to Atta. They have nothing else to directly link him to Atta and crew. Why are they taking a pass on a strong eyewitness? Why is Big Media taking a pass on breaking this story? (Surely they had this info. before the LA Weekly. No?)

46 posted on 08/01/2002 7:01:54 AM PDT by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: ForGod'sSake; Lancey Howard
Who stands to gain most from these apparent revelations? I don't know, but there's probably some conspiracy types that could come up with something.

Mr. Conspiracy Conjecturer here at your service. How about this? This bit about the hotel is a factoid which they can prove is untrue, or else prove true but still have nothing to do with the OKC bombing, and therefore there must be nothing to the Nichols / Philippine terrorists connection.

This is a proven strategy in the area of ufology. People DO see UFOs. The government doesn't want people blabbering on about what might be the newest toy in the black budget arsenal. Therefore they find one easy case which can be debunked and whose observers can be exposed as nuts or frauds. That way, any other legitimate observations by competent people can likewise be dismissed as just more tinfoil nutburgery.

Competent people are still seeing things that might be Aurora, stealth recon blimps, and Lord knows what else the ghost of Kelly's Lockheed Skunkworks left lying around, but they aren't going to risk the taint and ridicule by saying anything about it.

50 posted on 08/01/2002 8:08:19 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson