Posted on 07/29/2002 12:16:04 PM PDT by Polycarp
Yes, they can. Which ones are you having trouble with?
Pedophiles are more male than female by a ratio of 10:1, but female peds and ephebophiles do exist -- Mary Kay LeTourneau, Paula Poundstone are just two of the more recent cases. How many girls' gym coaches have initiated the next generation of sapphic girls? Yes, Virginia, there is a problem with female ephebophiles.
The men who act out are mostly heterosexual and prey on girls. Married men usually pick on teenaged or prepubescent girls. But the homosexual men who are not strictly pedophiles but ephebophiles (pederasts) are much more active than the hets, so that the numbers of boys molested by men is close to that of the number of girls molested.
And the boys who are hit on by men don't have to be "gay" themselves....it's a truism of male sexuality, that men don't care about the orientation of their sex partner, as long as he/she comes across. Hence the pederastic expression, "I'm going to skin some chicken tonight!"
I have a serious problem from the outset with anyone who thinks that the 5% have a moral right to mug the 95% and whip them into line using lies and bullyragging. Particularly when they're allied with the liberal mainstream press, which has been "out" on the issue since at least 1994, when the newsmagazines launched a major propaganda offensive built around the release of the Tom Hanks movie, Philadelphia. Which its creator admitted in an interview was a propaganda piece.
Humans are rational. Dogs aren't. Some people dehumanize themselves when they act like dogs. But that doesn't make their behavior rational.
Simple questions I like to ask to get people thinking about the intrinsic evils of "birth-control" and unnatural sex acts are: "What other bodily system do people deliberately damage? Would a sane person blind himself? Cut off his hand?" "Would a sane person try to eat a meal with his ears? Stick a finger in his eye?"
We regard these things as obviously wrong and unnatural, yet why do we use a different standard when it comes to ________?
The web site changes URLs constantly. That is a page directly from Butterfly Kisses website, Ive seen it as have many others. Sorry to burst your bubble its all true, but I see you cant handle the truth very well. EdReforms integrity is always above board, too bad you cant say the same. Youre pathetic and nothing more than a disrupter.
As recently said, the link changes. Here's another link that doesn't change. Now, what were you saying? Whoops. Looks like your post just got deleted.
We happened to be driving through New York City once and got intertwined with a gay rights parade. While we were stuck in traffic and forced to watch, including my three children, men in string bikinis on floats acting out anal intercourse. Then came a giant phallic condom float. And so on, and so on. (We didn't see a NAMBLA float, but I understand it's often there.) Gays have the right to engage in the most perverted kinds of sexuality if they want (though they endanger themselves, and rarely show concern for the others with regard to the manifold diseases they spread around). But to showcase such on the streets of New York? The society's gone mad. I resent this kind of behavior. I resent that my children saw it. I resent the fact the millions of other innocent children see it. Gays should be ashamed of themselves when they do this. But of course they're not. When you believe that having anal intercourse with scads of anonymous partners (a very common gay practice, according to CDC statistics), there's little to be ashamed about.
Invite predators to teach diversity in public schools? Make them scouting instructors?
Indeed, the address did change, almost certainly from all the publicity the site was given on Free Republic and in the WorldNetDaily article. I documented the address change in reply #93 of the thread Meet 'Women's Auxiliary of NAMBLA':
To: scripter
Hey Scrip -- looks like the perverts are on the run (or at least they had to move to a new address):
23 August 2002
Butterfly Kisses has moved to a new address.
bkisses@ziplip.com
93 posted on 7/23/02 1:46 PM Pacific by EdReform
Of course if one were to do a search for "Butterfly Kisses" on Google, the following would result:
Butterfly Kisses - Celebrating Love Between Women and Girls
... [ Introduction | News | Library | Speaking
Out | Media Guide | Links | Contacts ] The ...
home.uni-one.nl/hostroom/supergirl/ - Similar pages
Before the address change, I also successfully linked to the lesbian pedophilia web site via link provided by Google. What INOORH has posted on the International Organization of Heterosexual Rights web site are the contents of some of the pages. I can tell you that there were a large number of lesbian pedophilia links and and some of the stuff was pornographic in nature. No surprises there.
In the thread An UPDATE for "Womens Auxillary of NAMBLA", INOORH offered to supply the "backdoor address" to the "Butterfly Kisses" web site. I've emailed INOORH with that request. And you're right Clint, many people did see the lesbian pedophila web site before it moved.
Millie, there is a lesbian pedophilia problem and it's currently being investigated and documented. Squealing about it won't change that fact.
Parents should be suspicious of adult women who insist on spending excessive amounts of time with their daughters. The "Butterfly Kisses" web site had shown that lesbian pedophila is alive and well.
I saw some sort of program on Cher, and it was noting that Cher, on her many stage trips and such, left her daughter (Chastity) with a women caretaker. It turned out the caretaker was lesbian, and initiated Cher's daughter into lesbian sex (while the daughter was still quite young). Cher's daughter today is a confirmed lesbian. The result, I believe, of a determined lesbian molester.
Homosexual pedophila, both "gay" and "lesbian", is now a serious problem. While it is true that many children being abused by homosexuals are teenagers, the number of younger children affected is increasing rapidly. And yes, heterosexual pedophilia is a problem, as can be seen from the following web site:
The Pedophilia/Pedophile Education Web Site Mirror
What is of great concern is that there are people who are trying to "normalize" this filth, as documented in reply #14 in the thread An UPDATE for "Womens Auxillary of NAMBLA".
These are truly evil people who are doing this. NAMBLA is pure evil.
The bottom line is pedophiles must no longer be victims of hate-crimes and censorship for their beliefs. We must unite and stand against intolerance until we are accepted like gays are. My being a pedophile is simply a sexual-orientation, nothing more.
Some of us have been concerned about the above worldview for over a decade. Just a few months ago there were gay folks on FreeRepublic stating the above would never be accepted. I'm not saying it's accepted now, but in reading the above it's clear they want acceptance and it's just a matter of time before non-thinking folks start believing the lies of pedophiles. Maybe now some gays will realize the dangers in basing one's identity on "sexual-orientation". I doubt it, but you never know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.