"So the fact that the author is a Buchanan supporter automatically makes him a unthinking robot that takes all the great wisdom that flows out of the mouth of his god as gospel? I think that is an attack on the messenger since it was you, not he who invoked 'The Great Pat'. ;-)"
Would you care to point out any inconsistencies between this article and the pronouncements of "The Great Pat"? When you can demonstrate that this article is inconsistent with a Buchanan policy statements, then I'll withdraw my comments.
Would you care to point out any inconsistencies between this article and the pronouncements of "The Great Pat"? Why would I want to lie? I'll grant you that every point in the article is consistent with Buchanan's ideas.
When you can demonstrate that this article is inconsistent with a Buchanan policy statements, then I'll withdraw my comments.
I don't want you to withdraw any of your statements. I just wanted to know where the article is inconsistent with the truth. If you believe that by virtue of the author sharing the view of Buchanan makes it automatically wrong, well then, there is nothing further to say. Not to say that would make it true.