Skip to comments.
Study Says State Cigarette Taxes Deter Smoking
Reuters ^
| July 23, 2002
Posted on 07/23/2002 2:17:38 AM PDT by JediGirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
07/23/2002 2:17:38 AM PDT
by
JediGirl
To: JediGirl
Does this also mean that income taxes deter productivity?
To: JediGirl
The 20% drop represents those that have moved to less heavily taxed tobacco products or to the internet, or to other States for their cigs..Hubby switched to Swisher Sweet Lights little cigars three years ago..20 cig sized cigars with filters, about $1.05-$1.69 per pack. About half the cost of a carton of cigs.
3
posted on
07/23/2002 5:58:34 AM PDT
by
GailA
To: Prodigal Son
indisputably
4
posted on
07/23/2002 7:11:03 AM PDT
by
Maelstrom
To: *puff_list
To: JediGirl
LOL, do they not know that we find alteratives to TAXES.
Boy these people are stupid.
To: All
The most overlooked factor is the medical reprocussions of smoking. Consider big government's definition of the percentage of smokers who die of cancer (some 30%) and realize this sector includes any form of the disease (liver, cervical, bone, prostate, skin...) which may not have any relationship to the habit. Those who do in fact die from cancer which is actually related to smoking are well below 10% - consider the tab the remainder of you are picking-up! And most of them live beyond 60 years.
Even for those in that small group who are inducing carcinogenic effects, consider other health problems they might have, related medications which are irritating, and the soothing effects of smoking - it's often in their best interest to continue the habit.
Big government is simply lying.
To: Maelstrom
Aye, and these same dems claim that to jump start the economy we should raise income taxes. They play a double game here and I never understand why the media don't call 'em on it sometime just for fun. They say on the one hand that raising taxes here discourages an unwanted behaviour and on the other that it doesn't. Which is it? Going by their logic, raising cigarette taxes should cause more people to start smoking ;-)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Big government is simply lying.No, they're not. There will always be
a decrease in activity as it becomes higher
taxed. As prices get higher and higher,
though, until only one user is left standing,
the price for a pack of cigarettes would
theoretically have to top out at around
a million bucks. In other words, there
are limits, but we aren't there yet.
9
posted on
07/23/2002 12:16:16 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: JediGirl
Also promotes break and enter to retail stores and smuggling for organized crime.
To: jodorowsky
See post #10.
To: gcruse
"the medical reprocussions of smoking"... Big government is simply lying."
No, they're not.
Yes they are.
To: gcruse
It seems to me that if the Gov't would exert a little (ALOT of) discipline in their spending, The prices wouldn't be going higher and higher.It is the spending by elected officials,not the smoking that is raising the taxes on everything in the USA. Cigarettes just happen to be included and are a simple target for Elected Officials.It's not that difficult a situation to understand.
13
posted on
07/23/2002 1:55:34 PM PDT
by
Pagey
To: JediGirl
The second paragraph should have stated that LEGAL consumption declined 20 percent or more.....
I'm betting that the actual number of cigarettes consumed, never actually fell by that percentage. The anti-smoking group has absolutely no way of measuring the amount of ILLEGAL cigarette consumption going on, but rest assured, it's on the rise.
14
posted on
07/23/2002 2:20:05 PM PDT
by
spoiler2
To: gcruse
decrease in TAXED activity is more likely.
To: gcruse; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; red-dawg; ...
There will always be a decrease in activity as it becomes higher taxed. As prices get higher and higher. There is NO decrease in activity. Just ask all the conservative smokers in here. Like I have said: we buy over the NET, or the Reservations, roll our own, or go across state lines, which scares me to death. "I" would be the one to get caught.
I knew the minute they raised the taxes, and the smokers were no longer paying into the state coffers, someone would say smokers have decreased.
BET ME!
16
posted on
07/23/2002 5:15:10 PM PDT
by
SheLion
To: spoiler2
ILLEGAL cigarette consumption going on, but rest assured, it's on the rise. ILLEGAL? I roll a carton of cigarettes for under $8.00. It's perfectly legal.
Start Rolling Your Own
17
posted on
07/23/2002 5:17:24 PM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
There is NO decrease in activity.Just ask all the conservative smokers in here.If that's true for everybody, it is a disgusting
admission. Quitting smoking is hard; it's
not impossible. But f you're willing to break
the law or pay extremely high prices to continue
the habit...well, I have a War on Drugs I
want you to help me overthrow. Are we
libertarians yet? ;=)
18
posted on
07/23/2002 5:25:17 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: SheLion
Of course rolling your own is legal, but I was referring to all those creatively challenged folks who simply get them in boxes, without paying taxes.
Also, I'm totally in favor of both methods!
19
posted on
07/23/2002 5:50:54 PM PDT
by
spoiler2
To: spoiler2
Also, I'm totally in favor of both methods! hehe! Well, if I was doing it illegally, I would be the one to get caught. You know Murphy's Law. Well, Murphy HATES me. :)
20
posted on
07/23/2002 5:59:44 PM PDT
by
SheLion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson