Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Facts About Bush and Harken
National Review Online ^ | July 10,2002 | Byron York

Posted on 07/12/2002 3:11:27 PM PDT by Lady In Blue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Lady In Blue
bump
41 posted on 07/15/2002 7:04:38 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
A comment on the Chart of stock prices of Harken that you posted:

The June volume does not reflect the $845,000 sale by Bush, which would be about 211,000 shares. June volume is listed on your chart as 12,700. Was the sale made off the record? There have been public statements to the effect that the stock purchase from Bush was made by a wealthy Bahraini, again implying that the whole thing was a set-up.

Anyone who has followed the financial escapades of the Bush family would not be surprised by the above.

42 posted on 07/15/2002 7:09:14 AM PDT by NoLongerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NoLongerLurker
Very astute of you...... Not a cumulative June monthly chart but a last day of the month ending chart..... So a Bahrainian did buy the stock... Is there anything wrong with that. Maybe he thought there were gonna be big discoveries in the wells they were drilling and he'd make a huge profit. If he did hold for a few months he could have double his money as the stock hit $8 a share in Aug. 91 and had daily highs of up to $16 a share.
43 posted on 07/15/2002 8:06:33 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NoLongerLurker
However, the Bahraini announcement of the off shore drilling contract boosted the value of Bush's shares several fold. It was designed to put a large amount of money in Bush's hands.

I'm going to withhold judgement until I see a chart showing the stock before the Bahraini announcement and up thru Bush's sale.

That it was basically a scam is shown by two factors: a) Harken had no off shore drilling experience, and b) Harken never drilled a single well off shore in Barhain on the basis of that contract.

So, if a company has no offshore drilling experience, they never get any? Someone had to drill the first offshore well. Couldn't they hire engineers and oil men with the necessary experience?

44 posted on 07/15/2002 10:12:16 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: deport
Where did you find these closing prices?
45 posted on 07/15/2002 10:19:58 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; deport
HEC Dailies June 1990

Date Open High Low Close Volume Adj.
Close*
29-Jun-90 3.75 5.05 1.25 3.75 31,900 37.50
28-Jun-90 2.80 4.00 2.80 4.00 2,000 40.00
27-Jun-90 2.80 4.00 2.80 4.00 12,500 40.00
26-Jun-90 6.38 6.38 3.88 3.88 14,800 38.80
25-Jun-90 3.05 4.25 1.75 4.25 10,800 42.50
22-Jun-90 4.13 5.33 1.63 4.13 242,500 41.30
21-Jun-90 3.05 4.25 3.05 4.25 13,700 42.50
20-Jun-90 4.13 5.33 4.13 4.13 15,000 41.30
19-Jun-90 5.33 5.33 4.13 4.13 29,100 41.30
18-Jun-90 4.25 5.55 4.25 4.25 5,800 42.50
15-Jun-90 5.55 5.55 4.25 4.25 11,400 42.50
14-Jun-90 4.38 4.38 3.08 4.38 10,200 43.80
13-Jun-90 3.08 4.38 3.08 4.38 20,600 43.80

Source: Yahoo Finance: HEC


46 posted on 07/15/2002 10:27:44 AM PDT by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Here are the week ending HEC info for the year 1990. The Bahrainina deal was announced in Jan. 1990 and President Bush sold on June 22, 1990.... Notice that the stock had some daily highs of $10 after the sale.


HEC
Date Open High Low Close Volume Adj.
Close*
24-Dec-90 2.45 2.45 1.25 1.25 10,000 12.50
17-Dec-90 2.45 3.75 0.18 1.38 23,800 13.70
10-Dec-90 2.93 4.13 -1.13 1.50 17,500 15.00
3-Dec-90 3.17 4.25 0.67 1.75 22,500 17.50
26-Nov-90 3.30 3.30 0.67 1.88 24,700 18.70
19-Nov-90 0.83 3.30 0.83 2.00 15,600 20.00
12-Nov-90 4.50 4.50 -0.47 2.13 24,400 21.30
5-Nov-90 1.08 3.58 1.08 2.38 7,800 23.80
29-Oct-90 1.33 5.00 1.30 2.38 12,800 23.80
22-Oct-90 3.80 5.13 0.38 2.38 12,500 23.80
15-Oct-90 3.80 3.83 2.50 2.50 11,900 25.00
8-Oct-90 4.05 5.25 1.55 2.50 13,100 25.00
1-Oct-90 3.00 4.08 1.80 2.75 5,900 27.50
24-Sep-90 2.08 10.00 0.38 3.00 6,600 30.00
17-Sep-90 2.33 4.58 1.00 3.38 6,400 33.80
10-Sep-90 5.05 6.00 3.50 3.50 12,800 35.00
4-Sep-90 5.05 5.05 1.38 3.88 25,200 38.80
27-Aug-90 7.80 10.30 1.50 3.88 91,600 38.80
20-Aug-90 8.58 9.00 -3.20 4.00 31,300 40.00
13-Aug-90 5.63 5.63 2.05 3.00 23,000 30.00
6-Aug-90 5.30 8.50 2.08 3.38 25,500 33.80
30-Jul-90 6.50 8.50 2.55 4.00 7,500 40.00
23-Jul-90 4.25 8.05 3.05 4.13 47,800 41.30
16-Jul-90 2.55 5.05 -0.75 4.25 21,100 42.50
9-Jul-90 2.33 5.88 2.30 3.63 14,200 36.30
2-Jul-90 3.63 5.05 1.13 3.63 16,900 36.30
25-Jun-90 3.05 6.38 1.25 3.75 10,800 37.50
18-Jun-90 4.25 5.55 1.63 4.13 5,800 41.30
11-Jun-90 5.55 5.55 3.05 4.25 10,300 42.50
4-Jun-90 5.55 5.55 1.88 4.38 21,600 43.80
29-May-90 5.80 6.88 4.25 4.25 13,300 42.50
21-May-90 4.50 6.88 0.83 4.63 3,700 46.30
14-May-90 4.88 8.30 3.33 4.50 11,700 45.00
7-May-90 4.88 6.08 3.58 4.88 6,900 48.80
30-Apr-90 6.05 6.08 1.33 4.88 9,200 48.80
23-Apr-90 5.55 7.13 0.83 4.63 12,200 46.30
16-Apr-90 4.25 6.75 3.08 4.25 25,500 42.50
9-Apr-90 4.50 5.80 3.08 4.38 7,300 43.80
2-Apr-90 5.80 5.80 2.00 4.63 43,600 46.30
26-Mar-90 5.00 7.25 3.55 4.75 3,900 47.50
19-Mar-90 4.75 6.08 3.55 4.88 21,300 48.80
12-Mar-90 3.80 7.38 3.58 4.88 20,800 48.80
5-Mar-90 7.63 7.63 3.83 5.13 8,300 51.30
26-Feb-90 5.50 8.83 2.63 5.38 16,100 53.80
20-Feb-90 4.88 9.30 1.80 5.50 10,500 55.00
12-Feb-90 4.75 5.83 2.38 4.88 13,000 48.80
5-Feb-90 4.75 6.08 2.38 4.88 8,600 48.80
29-Jan-90 5.80 7.00 3.33 4.63 10,200 46.30
22-Jan-90 6.05 6.05 3.33 4.63 14,500 46.30
15-Jan-90 5.83 7.13 2.25 4.88 20,300 48.80
12-Jan-90 6.08 6.08 3.58 4.88 6,900 48.80

47 posted on 07/15/2002 10:36:30 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: deport; NoLongerLurker
You beat me to it. I was doing the same thing on Yahoo.

I don't see a big boost in January and even if there were, why would Bush wait until June to sell if "The Fix was in"?

48 posted on 07/15/2002 10:47:54 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

This is one story of how the sale occurred.....

The broker who handled the controversial sale of President Bush's energy stock in 1990 said yesterday that he suggested the deal to Bush, but the future President hesitated because he wanted to make sure the sale was allowed.

"There isn't a person of any more integrity that I've talked to in my life. He was a straight shooter," retired broker Ralph Smith told the Daily News in a telephone interview from his Los Angeles home.

He blamed renewed questioning of Bush's Harken Energy stock trade on "Clintonites" and called Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt — both Democrats — "a couple of rats."

Smith said the trade came about because he called Bush on behalf of an "institution" that wanted to buy Harken Energy stock after other Harken directors said they did not want to sell. Bush also was a member of company's board.

At first, Smith said Bush told him "he didn't know if he could sell, and to check back."

"I checked with the [Harken] lawyers to make sure he could sell. ... They said that he could," he said. The former broker said it was "implicit" in later conversations that Bush also had sought legal advice.

Smith said he called again a couple of weeks later, and "then he said he would be interested in selling. [Bush] decided on the amount," and in June 1990 sold 212,140 shares for $835,807.

Before the deal went through, Smith said, Harken's lawyers wrote "a letter to the transfer agent ... [assuring him] there was no insider information available that wasn't available to the public. That's why he was allowed to sell."

Democrats have suggested Bush — who has decried greed and fraud that has hurt investors — may have been involved in insider trading because shortly after the sale, Harken stock fell. Bush also failed to file necessary paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission for eight months.

Smith said he was interviewed about the deal by two lawyers from the SEC — the only time in his 25-year career that a trade he made resulted in such a probe.

Denies Political Link

He also rejected the whispers that some fat cat wanted to buy stock from Bush, whose father was then President, to curry favor with the White House.

"There wasn't anything political involved in any way, shape or form. ... Buyer didn't know who the seller is. Seller didn't know who the buyer is," Smith said. "I didn't divulge."


49 posted on 07/15/2002 11:14:28 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: deport
I used to deal with 144-A certificates all the time. You can't get the restriction lifted without a letter from the company's lawyer. If there was any question of inside info, they wouldn't have allowed him to sell.
50 posted on 07/15/2002 2:18:21 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson