Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City smokers to start paying $7 a pack today
News Radio 88 ^ | 7/1/02

Posted on 07/01/2002 5:25:58 AM PDT by areafiftyone

(New York-AP) -- It's costly to be a smoker in New York City now.

Beginning today, cigarette smokers in the city will pay more than seven dollars a pack for many major brands. The Bloomberg administration's new tax on cigarettes is expected to raise an additional 111 (M) million dollars of revenue this year.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg says the tax will prevent 50-thousand deaths -- including over 33-thousand premature deaths among city children.

The law raises the city tax on cigarettes from eight cents a pack to one dollar and 50 cents a pack.

Smokers in New York City will now pay more than double the national average for cigarettes.

Critics of the new tax say consumers could avoid the taxes by buying cigarettes over the Internet, in nearby states or from Indian reservations and from the underground market.

The mayor spent months negotiating with the City Council over how to close a five (B) billion dollar budget gap.

Besides the new cigarette tax, new fees were approved for cell phones and parking tickets for the budget year -- which begins today.<


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: MEGoody
Is your mother in law diabetic? I've never heard of someone losing a leg because of smoking - but it happens frequently because of diabetes.

Yes and that is probably 75 percent of the problem with her circulation. She started smoking at 13 though and smoking is also hard on circulation.

I understand your 'hatred' of smoking, but I find it appalling that they tax cigarettes as they do, yet barely touch liquor and leave porn totally unscathed. Perhaps those two 'sins' are the politicians favorites.

I think you might be right. I'm not a teatotalitarian Baptist type and this sin tax is obviously one small step short of prohibition. I wonder if there is a beer lobby and a porn lobby that is much stronger than the tobacco lobby. Drinking in moderation is actually not bad for your body and may even have a lot of benefits.

Porn is a whole different story. It is obviously prostitution which is also only illegal in the books but not in practice.

61 posted on 07/01/2002 9:58:09 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Interesting thread. Watching every liberal politician scramble to raise tobacco taxes "for the sake of the childeren" has become sort of a sick joke. Just once I'd love to see some media talking-head ask one of these questions:

1) With all the money taken from the tobacco companies in lawsuts and given to the states for "anti-smoking programs", why are there still childeren smoking? You'd think by now these programs would have ended that problem.

2) Since smoking is so bad , why not outlaw the manufacture of cigarettes?

--- And the one I'd really like to ask ANY Liberal---

3) If taxes on cigarettes are a way to reduce Smoking, doesn't it follow that Payroll taxes reduce employment, sales taxes reduce sales and corporate taxes reduce economic output?


62 posted on 07/01/2002 10:01:33 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Meanwhile my wife and homeschooling mother of 8 has to haul her all over the city to get her hair done and buy her groceries and take her to new leg therapy.

What about all of the times your mother-in-law took care of your wife when she was sick when she was growing up? What about all of the places she carted her to?

If you 'talk' this way about your mother-in-law in front of your children, I wouldn't doubt if they feel the same way about you when you are elderly and sick. I feel sorry for you.

63 posted on 07/01/2002 10:08:20 AM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Born in a Rage
What about all of the times your mother-in-law took care of your wife when she was sick when she was growing up?

If she had to pick up my wife at the slammer for teen drunkenness she might be justified in supporting more nanny rules about drinking then mightn't she?

Ever read what the bible says about rage?

64 posted on 07/01/2002 10:30:31 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
This is also going to be a big financial hit on all the city's delis. Fewer people coming in to buy cigarettes = fewer people coming in to buy anything, to say nothing of the lost profits from the lung candy itself.
65 posted on 07/01/2002 10:35:22 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DETAILER
Would it be legal for me to buy cigarrettes in my own town, then take them to NY and sell them to someone? A private sale?

No, it would not be legal. However, unless you're standing in the middle of Times Square with an entire truckload of cigarettes and a megaphone hawking them for $10 a carton, the cops aren't going to care. Hell, they'd probably buy from you themselves if they smoke. Just don't call attention to yourself.

66 posted on 07/01/2002 10:38:28 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
For anyone left who still thinks that Bloomberg is actually a "Republican".

Hey, lesser of two evils. If Green has won, the new tax would probably be three times as high, and he'd be working on trying to ban cars within city limits or something. Green's a true ultra-lefty. I'll take Bloomie.

67 posted on 07/01/2002 10:40:13 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
Was that the Civil War????
68 posted on 07/01/2002 10:43:11 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk; areafiftyone; newgeezer; Movemout; dennisw; Waskishi; MEGoody; Born in a Rage
I am sure spending a lot of effort taking care of my Mother in Law who smoked herself into a wheel chair. She lost her leg due to bad circulation due to 57 years of smoking and eating junk food...

It is impossible to definitively place blame on cigarette smoking for any individual person's diseases. IMPOSSIBLE. You can suspect. You can highly suspect, even. But you can never ever prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. She could have been genetically susceptible to circulation problems. It could have been entirely related to poor dietary habits. She could be one of those few unlucky people that got hit with fallout from all those above-ground nuke tests in the 50s and 60s. It could be anything.

Oh, and it's been proven that merely eating junk food is not the source of poor health in overweight people: It's being sedentary. You could be quite fat, but as long as you maintain just about any level of exercise whatsoever, even just a half-hour walk per day, then you're going to be in much better overall health than a thin person who eats absolutely "perfectly" but gets no exercise at all.

69 posted on 07/01/2002 10:51:35 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Just buy tobacco and rolling papers.
70 posted on 07/01/2002 10:52:21 AM PDT by truth_session
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300winmag
Why don't we just tax murder and make it legal? After all, it would save us SO much money from having to incarcerate all those people!
71 posted on 07/01/2002 10:54:18 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
LOL
72 posted on 07/01/2002 10:54:42 AM PDT by truth_session
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Bloomberg says the goal of this tax is to raise more revenue. Then he says it is to stop people from smoking. Well, which is it?


73 posted on 07/01/2002 11:00:58 AM PDT by dmeara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Doesn't Bloomy understand basic math? If he made the tax $7,000 per pack, the city could raise an additional $111 billion in taxes.
74 posted on 07/01/2002 11:09:55 AM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scruffdog
"See, their argument is that if you tax something enough, people will stop using it. Their REAL agenda here is nothing more than money-grubbing since they know that no one will stop simply because it costs more."

That's exactly right, I don't know how they keep a straight face when they say that. They say they want people to quit, but I doubt it, not when they see the revenues generated.

The tobacco companies have raised prices since the tobacco settlements with various states. Ultimately, that money is going into tort lawyers pockets and filling their coffers so they can go after "junk food" and alcohol. http://www.smokes-spirits.com

75 posted on 07/01/2002 11:10:03 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It is impossible to definitively place blame on cigarette smoking for any individual person's diseases. IMPOSSIBLE,

Only in the philosphical sense that you can not prove that yesterday existed, IMPOSSIBLE!

Oh, and it's been proven that merely eating junk food is not the source of poor health in overweight people: It's being sedentary. You could be quite fat, but as long as you maintain just about any level of exercise whatsoever, even just a half-hour walk per day, then you're going to be in much better overall health than a thin person who eats absolutely "perfectly" but gets no exercise at all.

I'm a fittness nut and I agree 100 percent. I love biking to work and lifting weights.

76 posted on 07/01/2002 11:41:59 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
If she had to pick up my wife at the slammer for teen drunkenness she might be justified in supporting more nanny rules about drinking then mightn't she?

There are already laws concerning "teen drunkenness" -- it's against the law for them to drink at all, as you know, so your analogy doesn't fit.

Ever read what the bible says about rage?

I'm not sure...maybe. Ever read what the Bible says about 'wonking'? Hehehe

77 posted on 07/01/2002 12:14:27 PM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I agree. My grandmother had cancer and she never smoked. My friend, only 35, has cancer and he never smoked. I have a few other extended family members who have had cancer and they never smoked. Of all of my relatives who smoke, none of them have cancer, thank God.

When I was pregnant with my first child, I quit smoking and would not smoke anywhere around him....he has asthma. When I was pregnant with my twins, the doctor said to just cut down on smoking, but don't quit because the stress would be bad for the babies and I could lose them....they don't have asthma. Go figure.

78 posted on 07/01/2002 12:22:47 PM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
biblewonk good argument for agnosticism since  September 12th, 2000

79 posted on 07/01/2002 12:33:40 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
I'm here to stay (bring it down)
Bring it down!
Gonna bring it down
Gonna break it down
Gonna break it

This state is elevating, as the hurt turns into hating Anticipating all the f*cked up feelings again

80 posted on 07/02/2002 5:46:58 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson