Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/24/2002 7:29:06 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Stand Watch Listen
Considering how many big fat bloated Americans there are, the lawyers should keep busy for a while.
2 posted on 06/24/2002 7:39:34 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
And right now what some call the professional health nannies are in high gear demonizing fatty and junk food the same way tobacco was demonized. Longtime self-styled consumer activist and former presidential candidate Ralph Nader asserted in the New York Times Magazine in June that "McDonald's double cheeseburgers [are] a weapon of mass destruction." Pop singer Moby recently said on HBO's Dennis Miller Live that "all the lawsuits" will force fast-food restaurants to become totally vegetarian in 25 years. In 1998 Kelly Brownell, director of Yale University's Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, told the Boston Herald, "There is no difference between Ronald McDonald and Joe Camel. … We need to start thinking about this in a more militant way."

What happened to "lifestyle choice?"
"Individual rights?"

They propogandize and dictate through liberal trial lawyers what lifestyle they've chosen for us. Only the lifestyles they choose for us are politically correct. We'll have individual rights only when they allow us to have them.
Forcing someone to think contrary to their conscience creates hate.
Hate creates violence.
Violence creates war.
Political correctness laws and their thought police have created more hate in this world than ever before.
What they say they're doing to save humanity from itself is destroying humanities free will instead.
Only hate, violence, war will result from every oppressive law the left leaning heart can create.

No thanks. I'd prefer not to have my soul imprisoned by liberal extremists. My lifestyle choice is one with FREE WILL.

5 posted on 06/24/2002 7:55:45 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I, for one, have become bored smacking the hell out of smokers and relish the thought of beating on fat people.

While I'm helping to reduce fat people to the status of lepers I'll be thinking of who the next group will be that I can pummel.

Hummmm.....How about the Boy Scouts ,white males, hetrosexual marriage, religion, moralists, Costitutionalists, our Founding Fathers, the rule of law, property rights, privacy rights , ....... hang on.

I'll think of one.

6 posted on 06/24/2002 8:04:15 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *puff_list
OOOhhhhh Baby, can you say, "We TOLD you so"?

Let's take them in order.

As Insight reported in June 1997, "many also wonder if the demonizing of cigarettes will lead to a 'slippery slope' in which caffeine, fatty food, chocolate and anything else the public-health community might deem bad or politically incorrect becomes subject to regulation or prohibition" [see "Fighting the Tobacco Wars," June 16, 1997].
Can you say,"We TOLD you so."?

Longtime antitobacco crusader John Banzhaf ridiculed this notion. Cigarettes were a uniquely dangerous product, he and other lawsuit supporters maintained.
Of COURSE he ridiculed the notion. Don't give any OTHER business a heads up that they are coming after you NEXT.

But there's no other industry in the United States that kills anywhere near 500,000 people a year."
My, my, where DO the numbers come from? first it was 300,000, then 400,000, now it's 500,000, even though according to them LESS people are smoking.

That was then and this is now. Five years later, fresh from his victory over tobacco companies, Banzhaf is a leader of a movement of trial lawyers and public-health activists who are marshaling the strategies used against tobacco to go after fast-food restaurants and food processors that sell "fatty" food, candy, soft drinks and other consumables deemed politically incorrect.
Ah, another 'leader'. Sieg Heil!

"Hit junk-food junkies where it hurts: in their wallets" by "slapping high-fat, low-nutrition foods with a substantial government 'sin' tax."
What do you say we hit KELLY where it hurts. Like, upside the head!

the states have been hurting for revenue in the Clinton economic downturn, and public-health activists are pitching food excise tariffs as small taxes that could be turned into bigger ones after the pubic gets used to them.
The old boiling frog method.

To compound this, the IRS in April classified obesity as a "disease" for deduction of medical expenses. This reminds many observers of when Food and Drug Administration Commissioner David Kessler shifted the blame from individual smokers to the tobacco companies by calling smoking a "pediatric disease." Tort reformer Schwartz says, "That's important, because if obesity is a disease, then it's not your fault. That's a very important step because the plaintiffs' lawyers and those who want to make an assault on fatty food have to move away from the concept of individual responsibility just like the antitobacco people had to move away from the idea that you choose to smoke."
What is the IRSdoing classifying ANYTHING as a 'disease'?
Yes, just as the classification of 'addictive' was changed for tobacco so will the classification of 'fat', 'obese', and 'food' be changed.

7 posted on 06/24/2002 8:08:41 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Milk commercials "tell you, 'Drink this milk for health reasons,' but then they fail to tell you that milk has a lot of saturated fat and cholesterol, and that you can get all of whatever these health benefits are without these risks by drinking skim milk," Banzhaf says. "That, to me, is very close to McDonald's."

WRONG. The FDA stopped the milk lobby from using any claims to the health benefits of milk some years ago. It seems these same fat nazis didn't like the "milk it does a body good" ads.

9 posted on 06/24/2002 8:11:17 AM PDT by Gaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Animal fat is a natural substance easily digested by the human body when used with a whole grain. McDonalds should just make their buns a little more rustic. Offer a choice, so they cannot be blamed for lifestyle choices..

It's not animal fat so much that's doing the nation damage. It's processed fats. They're plastic food after being processed. The body cannot rid itself of them.

Put some margerine on a plate and place it on a windowsill. With the exception of an occational fly falling into it, even the bugs won't eat it! Mold won't eat it! It dries into a plastic chunk!
This is the food the liberals want us to eat?
I think the reason the liberals are so wacked out is because their brains are starving. They eat the real trash without substanance.

12 posted on 06/24/2002 8:36:45 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
If I want to buy a couple dozen Twinkies today and spend all day eating them, I should be able to do so. Why? Because I'm an American and have the right to become a fat@$$! Does the phrase "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" mean ANYTHING anymore?!?!

I'm hungry.
15 posted on 06/24/2002 8:51:08 AM PDT by Genesis defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
"If mighty McDonald's is willing to shell out $12 million for this kind of suit, then it's quite possible that other companies will shell out likewise."

Excactly, but maybe when you hit the majority of average PEOPLE, these average people will wake up, and start fighting the life style police.

16 posted on 06/24/2002 12:24:16 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
These people must all die. There is no other apparent method to stop this nonsense, which will end up costing us billion$of dollar$. Also, close the law schools for ten years. We have a super-abundance of lawyers...and this is not good for our nation.
18 posted on 06/24/2002 12:35:44 PM PDT by szweig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I hear video games are addictive too. Maybe we should sue for all the homework the kids blow off.
19 posted on 06/24/2002 4:31:48 PM PDT by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Ugh please don't make me eat a tofu burger. I prefer mine semi-bloody, with cheese, lots of salt and very greasy, thank you very much.
22 posted on 06/29/2002 4:55:47 AM PDT by splach78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
More tyranny of the minority. I'm sick of such a**holes. Somebody needs to duct tape this drooling Socialist to his chair and feed him intraveneously..............bu t only feed him for a short while.
23 posted on 06/29/2002 5:04:10 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Are we the only country this screwed up?

We're slowing suing ourselves into socialism.

24 posted on 06/29/2002 5:11:18 AM PDT by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Income transfer program

People==>Lawyers===>Democrats

26 posted on 06/29/2002 5:12:51 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson