Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don Myers
Smokers say that smoking is a constitutional right, therefore, it is not out-of-line to ask just where the constitution lists smoking as a right.

I've yet to meet a smoker who has made any such comment.

As a smoker I do claim it is the choice of the PRIVATE property owner to determine his/her clientele.

I don't enter establishments that have raw shrimp in close proximity to the clientele. I can't handle it. I love shrimp and it is consumed on a regular basis in this household. But, I have to leave when my husband is cleaning it. I guess I'm entitled to push for a state law forbidding the presence of raw shrimp in any "public" place.

Good gravy

200 posted on 06/24/2002 5:16:11 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
"I've yet to meet a smoker who has made any such comment. "

Here is one example from this thread of just that. "I argue this case STRICTLY from a Constitutional standpoint while most non-smokers who wish to argue it do so from a Personal Desires/Emotional standpoint. "

212 posted on 06/24/2002 5:56:30 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson