Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rambo316
His Justice Department has declared that U.S. citizens, whom it declares to be "Enemy Combatants," have no constitutional rights – none.

What puzzles me most about this is the timing. This concept of "enemy combatant" for a U.S. citizen wasn't formulated until Jose Padilla, the "dirty bomber" was arrested and promptly hidden away in a brig.

Meanwhile, Johnny Walker Jihad, a true enemy combatant, and a U.S. citizen, has an attorney and is getting a trial, as are two non-citizens, Moussaoui and Reid. All three of these have proven themselves dangerous creatures by acts, not intent. And yet Padilla is treated as a far worse villain.

I can't help but wonder what there is about Padilla that makes it mandatory that he be kept incommunicado forever. Could it be that he really is linked to the Oklahoma City bombing? The government's treatment of him defies logic in comparison to the other three, and opens the Justice Department to ridicule even by those who have no concerns about the Constitution.

20 posted on 06/22/2002 10:22:23 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Free the USA; Fish out of Water; Libertarianize the GOP; A. Pole; Agrarian; Alamo-Girl; Anthem; ...
ping
21 posted on 06/22/2002 11:33:16 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: browardchad
Some info here on 'combatants'

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/ scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&am p;vol=317&invol=1
26 posted on 06/22/2002 12:30:33 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson