"Basically they said look, if you embarrass us - by us we mean the Democratic Party - if you, Bush-Ashcroft, indict Clinton on bribery or go after Hillary or any of this - we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything. You're not going to get any (legislation) passed if four years." OK, assuming that this is true... since we clearly haven't seen 'his' laegislation passed, and we haven't seen any movcement on nominations... then evidently the rats didn't get any guarantees from him.
OK, assuming that this is true... since we clearly haven't seen 'his' legislation passed, and we haven't seen any movement on nominations... then evidently the rats didn't get any guarantees from him. Not necessarily, it could very well mean the RATS lied AGAIN.
Could it be that this was leaked to let us know why the Bush Admin. is not going after the clintons.
If I had information on clintons and wanted it out, I would leak it without giving my name....remember Linda Tripp, who told the truth, and what happened to her. The RATS may be in power again and they don't forget.
OK, assuming that this is true... since we clearly haven't seen 'his' laegislation passed, and we haven't seen any movcement on nominations... then evidently the rats didn't get any guarantees from him.
OK, assuming this is true... would you put it past the Democrats to double-cross the GOP on a handshake deal?
I'm inclined to think the leak isn't true, or not exactly so. Wouldn't surprise me if the Dems made noises like this. Also wouldn't surprise me if Bush wasn't going to make a big move on the Clintons anyway. Whatever Bill and Hill's guilt, there are real problems with establishing a precedent for incoming Presidents to use the Justice Department to investigate and prosecute ex-Presidents.
Sooner or later a Democrat will be President again. They are shameless bullies and will stoop to any justification to savage their foes and further their interests.
