[Clint N. Suhks]

Central to the attempts to separate homosexuality from pedophilia is the claim that pedophiles cannot, by definition, be considered homosexuals. … The basis for this claim is the view that pedophiles who molest boys cannot be considered homosexual if that individual has at any time been married or sexually involved with women.

This is their biggest lie. The paraphiliac pathology is same-sex attraction, to differentiate part time pathological behavior and full time pathological behavior is ludicrous. The person who practices both pedophilia and adult relationships is still a pedophile and not a bi-pedophile. A person who engages in homosexual behavior is a homosexual regardless of exclusivity. The only thing so called bi-sexuality proves is that it’s a choice and not an innate condition. Homosexuals, because of their pathology, are more likely to engage in other paraphiliac behaviors; they’re all interrelated.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Ping

[Kevin Curry]

". . . the claim that pedophiles cannot, by definition, be considered homosexuals."

Then there are the two men who sexually assaulted and murdered 13 year-old Jesse Dirkhising--who were also homosexual lovers. By any definition those two pedophiles were homosexuals.