Yet. But when it does it will be Bush's fault right ?
If it does and Bush was asleep, yes it would be his fault. Command is a lonely thing. If you can handle the frying pan then don't jump in.
Why is it that finding fault and placing blame are the two things that get the most response? The "blame-Bush crowd" on offense vs. the "Bush-bots" on defense. Didn't this forum have some actual intellectual content discussions once upon a time? IF you think Global Warming might happen, tell us WHY, and then discuss why it might get blamed on Bush (appropriately or not). Asserting someone else's potential thoughts on the matter is hardly proper debate material.
Rush Limbaugh always pooh-pooh'ed those who said his show would suffer without Clinton in the White house... maybe FR is the conservative outlet that can't handle the fact that we don't have a corrupt Democrat in office. I think it's healthy that we have the pro and con discussions about the president, especially since he is from the Right. Unfortunately, instead of keeping it constructive, topical, and substantive, we're deteriorating into something less... not quite the "only-one-opinion-allowed" type of board like DU, but certainly below FR's usual standards.