Posted on 06/06/2002 10:40:41 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:29:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
SACRAMENTO - California has acquired 25,000 acres along its far northwest coast that will be joined with other public lands to form the largest contiguous redwood forest to be safeguarded in the state.
The Mill Creek watershed, purchased for $60 million, will link the redwood groves of the Jedediah Smith and Del Norte Coast Redwood state parks and connect inland and coastal habitats. It also borders on parts of the Smith River National Recreation area and Redwood National Park, more than 6 million acres of protected public land in all.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
I watched part of the Senate Judiciary hearings with Lehey, Kennedy, Schumer, Boxer, Biden and Spector. I am starting to agree with the "tree-huggers". My crab grass is smarter than that group and has more moral integrity. I have never met a redwood tree I didn't like.
Now there, you got me. Even a weed has more sense than that group you enumerated.
I have never met a redwood tree I didn't like.
Hmmmmm. Nah. I never once had the urge to hug a tree.
If you're going to accomoodate people (and note that recreational uses for the new park were mentioned), there is stuff that needs to be maintained. As far as I can tell, it is not.
Seems to me they have a lot more land than they need in the park system down here, and yet they are angling to get even more. The park system has bought up a very expensive tract of land in Lower Topanga canyon, near the ocean, and they are in the process of throwing out all the current residents. Some renters will get payoffs of over $80,000 thanks to the high cost of even vaguely equivalent housing in the area. I think it's insane to remove housing units from a region that's desperately short on housing. It certainly says how hypocritical our Coastal Commission is when it claims "affordable housing" is a goal; Lower Topanga was one of the few areas of the Malibu/Topanga area where "affordable housing" was even vaguely close to being a reality. (We're talking about $1,000-1,500 a month rents here, instead of $3,500-50,000 a month).
D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.