Concerning #927... It isn't that simple; you're leaving out the restrictions. I'll flag ya with what I have later, 'k? 4:21 am, and I have run out of gas.
I have to admit I'm pretty astonished at the organized 'lessons' of how to qualify available on the Google search.... Looks like some are making alot of money on these scams.
"It isn't that simple; you're leaving out the restrictions."Of course it isn't that simple, and the kitty knows that his posts have no bite with intelligent people. What's simple to do is to cut through the propaganda smoke-screen, and see them for what they are: inflammatory, baseless, rethoric for the consumption of soccer moms, and the impressionable.
One thing about those qualifications that astound me, that most people can't see this chance at legalization for what it truly is.
Conservatives oppose gun registration because of the inherent danger it poses, it creates a data base which could be used to grab our guns. We want our guns unregistered so that the Feds don't know where they are.
Here we have illegal immigrants in the country, that everyone seems to want rounded up and deported, but since they are here illegaly, we don't know where they are.
So, get them to register by applying for a hearing under 245(i), then we know where they are, don't we?
Concerning #927... It isn't that simple; you're leaving out the restrictions.
Yeah, there are dates the Illegal has to be in the country by before receiving this Amnesty, and a few other things. But here's what's simple, what the "restrictions" don't change:
Section 245(i) is nothing but a way for certain targeted Illegals to "change status" so that they become legal. It is rewarding their lawbreaking. It is most definitely an Amnesty.
There seems to be a fallback position among Amnesty Deniers to say, "but it's not a BLANKET Amnesty." That's beside the point as it was never the claim. Nor is it a sufficent defense for those defending the Administration on 245(i), as they were claiming it wasn't Amnesty at all.
