The bank robber (illegal) gets a trial (hearing) to find out if he's guilty or not guilty.
The illegal gets a hearing (trial) to find out if he can stay or has to go.
Nice bit of nonsense, that.
The application process for a Section 245(i) Amnesty is in no way analogous to a trial. In a trial, the bank robber is charged with a crime. In an Amnesty, the charges are never filed.
What you have here is a fallacy of false analogy. Not at all surprising.
