Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Few Questions For Die-Hard Bush Supporters
Toogood Reports ^ | June 5, 2002 | Lee R. Shelton IV

Posted on 06/05/2002 1:20:54 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,301-1,302 next last
To: Stand Watch Listen
"1) these people really and truly believe in what Bush is doing"

And, Vermonters Jim Jeffords and Patrick Leahy 'screwed the pooch' with regards to half of Congress and the Judiciary.

So, we are 'stuck' until the people decide in November whether they want to move right, move left, or stay on the 'left-tilting' slope in the middle.

Give me one example of a 'blessing' that will accrue to Bush if he 'presses' conservative issues without hope of clearing the Senate. It's up to 'We, the people', not, he, the President, to 'choose' the direction available for Bush to move legislation. Without the votes, Congress and media will play 'rope-a-dope' until the Bush clock runs out, and then blame him for lack of accomplishment.

281 posted on 06/05/2002 5:08:33 PM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
>>Go back and read the rest of what I wrote (or did I exhaust your vocabulary?)...You say the campaign finance law is unconstitutional. How do you know? That's your opinion. But who gave you the right to declare what laws are constitutional and which are not? In fact, who gave the President the authority to declare what bills are constitutional and which are not? Seems to me the Constitution you claim to respect gives that authority to the judiciary. I had this debate with someone on FR when the bill was signed, and he actually said that a President had the authority to ignore whatever LAWS(!) he thought were unconstitutional. It seems that kind of exercise of power is called "dictatorship."<<

You're beautiful when you're angry. HA!

Please explain to me, O Enlightened One, where it says the president MUST sign any bill that he disagrees with; that his hands are tied? Please explain this concept to me.

GWB decried CFR on the campaign trail, then made jokes to the press about how quickly he would sign it.

But I guess he had no choice. Am I to understand that this is what you're saying?

282 posted on 06/05/2002 5:09:35 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Now they've been shown up for what they are: impotent. They've lost their leverage, and they are mad as hell.

You must be talking about the Paleo-losers...

283 posted on 06/05/2002 5:09:47 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
President Bush told us all that it will be a long war so you might want to remind yourself of that fact from time to time....why ask a question when you know the answer? Any law passed by Congress can be repealed by Congress at any time!
284 posted on 06/05/2002 5:10:06 PM PDT by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
All men are NOT created equal. But society owes the individual equal status before the law.

Preach it, brother!

I'm 6' 6" tall. Are you?

6'3"

I can do a 360-degree slam dunk. Can you?

Um....I can usually hit the backboard from 10 feet, does that count?

I can hit a golf ball 340-yards down the fairway consistently. Can you?

Only if the ball has little JATO bottles mounted on it.

You probably are capable of doing things that I could only dream of.

I can troubleshoot a MIL-STD-188C Mode I circuit in twenty seconds while telling that really tasteless joke about Osama bin Laden, the camel, and the edible burkha.

285 posted on 06/05/2002 5:10:16 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: ruoflaw
>>President Bush told us all that it will be a long war so you might want to remind yourself of that fact from time to time....why ask a question when you know the answer? Any law passed by Congress can be repealed by Congress at any time!<<

Or as my grandma would say, "The fox is guarding the henhouse."

286 posted on 06/05/2002 5:11:20 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
GWB decried CFR on the campaign trail

Let's see some QUOTES from Bush decrying CFR.

287 posted on 06/05/2002 5:11:47 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
"Believe it not, through threads such as this we may be influencing 100000's of potential voters ... the lurkers who read these threads and the people they talk to. We may be influencing some in government who stop by to feel the pulse of their "supporters". We might even influence some in the media who to reading what is written on this forum. Or are you a 'cynic'?"

Unfortunately, several hundred thousand won't do much good. It will take several million.

And no, not a cynic; I'm a 'real cynic no more'!

288 posted on 06/05/2002 5:12:11 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I am one of those who voted for Bush and insist on holding his feet to the fire on the important issues.

Having said that, I think Rush Limbaugh hit it right on the head yesterday concerning the Bush agenda and strategy:

"The White House thinks their strategy is working like a charm and, really, who could argue with them? Their strategy is not to really spell out their own agenda and fight for it no matter what. Their strategy is to advance a centrist agenda that consists of a sizable percentage of the left's agenda, issue by issue. In the process, they're picking off Democrat votes. They're doing two things. They're denying Democrats issues to run on, and at the same time giving specific members of the Democrat coalition reasons to vote for Bush or against the Democrat candidates. The way they're looking at it, it's working."

I think those who have pledged their undying allegiance to President Bush are very happy with this. To them winning isn't the most important thing, it's the only thing. They are quite content with a "centrist" agenda/president and are quite willing to accept a great percentage of the left's agenda if it means 80% approval ratings and winning elections.

Unfortuneately, they are in the vast majority in the GOP at the present time and so they have earned their victory. Still, constitutional conservatives should be vigilant in holding the President's feet to the fire on important issues. When they do, their patriotism should not be questioned.

289 posted on 06/05/2002 5:12:36 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
BeAChooser said: "And that is only going to happen if the Bush DOJ does it job and investigates/prosecutes the crimes that were committed by the democRATS."

I doubt that this will happen. When you are governor of a state, like Clinton was, you have the power to rape a woman and pay no consequences. You have the power to extort cash in exchange for political appointments with no consequences. And you have the power to influence medical examiners to get any outcome you wish to an autopsy. As President he was much more visible but also more powerful.

I don't think our nation has an adequate way to stop such people if they are supported by a majority. I have a neighbor who is so illogical and fearful of the unknown that she can be influenced easily with propaganda. There is no way to convince her of anything to which the liberal media has not agreed. I would be satisfied if I could just find a way to distract her from going to the polls on election day.

Destroying the liberal media must be the goal and must be accomplished prior to any expectations of holding Clinton or any other powerful criminal accountable.

290 posted on 06/05/2002 5:13:31 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: NMC EXP; mafree; mhking; CaptBlack; Howlin; Texasforever; MissMarple; anniegetyourgun; PhiKapMom
Neither do the Ten Commandments, in your apparent worldview.

Oh! How smug of you! How trite! How juvenile! You'd have fared better by not even answering me back seeing that you didn't refute what I said at all.

You're talking to a Born-Again Christian, yet say the Ten Commandments somehow don't have the force of law to me (needless to say that Christ already took care of that for me)? Puh-leeze!

One word for ya, pahtnah... CHECKMATE.

291 posted on 06/05/2002 5:14:02 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Your post #4.. Right on!!

Gee,..and he did all that while defending our Nation as our President. He has managed to be there for the troops, for the victims and survivors of our worst attack in our history. He IS working for our security every day,..but some people seem to think he is smoking cigars and banging on bongos. Not to mention all the hot spots in the world (are these people who write this kind of dribble watching ANY news media outlets??), that were left abandoned as far as any kind of Foreign Policy under Clintoon. We have a HUGE mess to contend with. Do ya think maybe the President is hugely busy trying to undo the friggin mess left by Clintoon!!

Just "HOW" do people think the job could be better done than this President is doing it? Name a person who could do it better. Idea's. Not just some whining "I'm so mad because he isn't doing things just the way I want" rant!

I don't agree with every single thing a President does, never will. Goes against human nature. But good grief.... this borders on totally insane. Akin to shooting oneself in ones own foot!!!

God Bless this President!!! I hope he is in office for a very long time. I PRAY we will have a Republican Senate, so we can truly get things done. (Do ya think the people writing this crap, realize he is up against Sen. DASH-hole?)

An old saying "With friends like this, who needs enemies" comes to mind.

Go figure... sheesh!

292 posted on 06/05/2002 5:14:16 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
To be ingnorant, meaning to lack education or information, is one thing. To be dumber than a box of rocks is quite another. One person can potentially be reasoned with; the other will always remain unreachable. I am disappointed to note that too many posters on FR fall into the latter category.
293 posted on 06/05/2002 5:14:41 PM PDT by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Great Post, reasonable and true
294 posted on 06/05/2002 5:14:50 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
LOL. Your flinging that CINO moniker at anyone who doesn't agree 100% with you is what triggered the term Broken-Record Conservative to pop into my head.

Yeah, I used it TWICE in general terms.

So you bark out insulting names and then decry when someone responds to you in kind. Childish, indeed.

I'm quite happy discussing the issues, but I'm not going to sit still when atacked or insulted. Go back and read the thread, I didn't open the can of worms. And I didn't address you at all.

OBTW, since I support the second amendment, am pro-life, for tax cuts, school vouchers, home schooling, reduced gov't, privatization of some gov't functions, abolishment of some civil service rules, right-to-work laws, and haven't voted for a Democrat in at least a dozen years, how exactly does that make me a CINO? Please explain.

I know you do. I didn't refer to you and I didn't address you until this post.

295 posted on 06/05/2002 5:15:49 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Forgive me for not pinging you on this one. Please see #291.
296 posted on 06/05/2002 5:16:03 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I heard him do it with my own ears. You may call me a liar if you wish. You are quick to assign evil motives to those who dare disagree with you.

But let's stop right there. Either:

1) Bush disagreed with CFR and signed it (which reinforces my point), OR

2) Bush agrees with CFR.

It's a no-win situation. Do you see that?

297 posted on 06/05/2002 5:16:56 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Another great post
298 posted on 06/05/2002 5:16:57 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Ouch! I guess he forgot what happens when he ASS-U-MES.
299 posted on 06/05/2002 5:17:02 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"You know what is so odd? I saw Buchanan on TV this very week and guess what -- he said he TRUST Bush and Ashcroft. Was ALL behind them. "

Ouch...I wouldn't spread that around if I were a Bushbot.

300 posted on 06/05/2002 5:17:30 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,301-1,302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson