To: CoolGuyVic
Wait a dog gone minute, now...I kept reading on the other thread that the VRWC, in conjunction with the VLWC, were misrepresenting the report, and that it didn't at all mean what it said.
Why, then, would the President "dismiss" it?
12 posted on
06/04/2002 10:11:40 AM PDT by
B Knotts
To: B Knotts
For goodness sakes, give it a rest, will ya? You were WRONG.
16 posted on
06/04/2002 10:12:19 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: B Knotts
This is just like the earlier ANWR report.
To: B Knotts
If you will recall, when Bush developed his water policy on the Klamath Basin earlier this year, he relied exclusively on NAS and totally dismissed USFWS and NMFS.
To: B Knotts
Hey, if the beaureaucracy is so stupid, then why doesn't he fire them? This is stupid. Bush is trying to have it both ways. He should have hired competent people.
770 posted on
06/04/2002 4:22:29 PM PDT by
Satadru
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson