Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CoolGuyVic
Wait a dog gone minute, now...I kept reading on the other thread that the VRWC, in conjunction with the VLWC, were misrepresenting the report, and that it didn't at all mean what it said.

Why, then, would the President "dismiss" it?

12 posted on 06/04/2002 10:11:40 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
For goodness sakes, give it a rest, will ya? You were WRONG.
16 posted on 06/04/2002 10:12:19 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts
This is just like the earlier ANWR report.
29 posted on 06/04/2002 10:14:36 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts
If you will recall, when Bush developed his water policy on the Klamath Basin earlier this year, he relied exclusively on NAS and totally dismissed USFWS and NMFS.
96 posted on 06/04/2002 10:30:28 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts
Hey, if the beaureaucracy is so stupid, then why doesn't he fire them? This is stupid. Bush is trying to have it both ways. He should have hired competent people.
770 posted on 06/04/2002 4:22:29 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson