Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/03/2002 7:37:35 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Stand Watch Listen
The sad thing is that Bush will sign this thing just like he did the farm bill instead of vetoing it unless they cut the pork....Makes you proud to pay your taxes...NOT!
2 posted on 06/03/2002 7:04:43 PM PDT by Suzie_Cue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen,CincinnatiKid ,jd792 ,dixie sass,chesty puller,antivenom,muggs ,Grendelgrey ,G
BUMP AND EMAIL OUT
3 posted on 06/04/2002 2:06:42 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
On the Hill, it's known as the Pork Express. This being an election year, and any anti-terrorism legislation being virtually assured of passage, expect this to be a rule, not an exception.

I wouldn't be surprised if Robert Byrd used this situation to have a monument erected in his name.

5 posted on 06/05/2002 5:18:17 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Tro the bums out!
11 posted on 06/05/2002 6:54:41 AM PDT by sandydipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Anti-Terror Bill Faces Veto Threat

AP | 6/5/02

WASHINGTON- The White House threat to veto the Senate's $31.4 billion anti-terrorism bill is inconsistent with recent Bush administration warnings of possible new attacks by the al-Qaida network, the Senate majority leader said Wednesday.

"It's troubling that the administration would say that we're spending too much on homeland defense, that we're spending too much on the effort on the war on terror ... given the fears generated by the pronouncements" by the administration, Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., told reporters.

White House officials issued the veto threat Tuesday, complaining that the measure exceeds the $27.1 billion request that President Bush sent Congress in March. The election-year squabble pits administration efforts to limit spending at a time when federal deficits are returning against Democratic attempts to beef up domestic counter-terror initiatives.

"For the administration to say, 'Well, we want to respond but not that much,' is a hard sell to the American people," Daschle said.

Senators from both parties lined up to offer amendments. They included an effort by Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., to add $150 million for summer schools and a plan by bipartisan fiscal conservatives to set spending limits for the next five years, which both seemed likely to lose.

"We're going to go after this pork barrel spending and go after it and after it and after it," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who was preparing amendments to cut items from the bill.

Daschle set a procedural vote that was likely on Thursday to limit debate on the measure. He seemed likely to prevail, which could mean the Senate would finish the bill this week.

In Tuesday's only roll call, the Senate voted 91-4 to drop a ban the bill had included on new emergency loans for airlines until Oct. 1. The loans are part of a bailout program for air carriers enacted just after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The vote was a major boon to financially ailing US Airways, which says it needs a $1 billion emergency loan this summer. By erasing the $393 million the loan restrictions were supposed to save, the overall bill's cost grew to $31.4 billion.

The House anti-terror bill would block new loans until October, but aides predict the eventual House-Senate compromise will omit the restrictions.

The counterterror legislation is dominated by funds for defense, intelligence, aviation safety, local law enforcement and aid to help New York rebuild from the attacks. Most Senate add-ons are for domestic security programs.

"The Senate bill includes scores of unneeded items that total billions of dollars - all classified as an `emergency,'" said a White House statement on the bill. "The bill adds unrequested funds for numerous programs and projects throughout nearly all of the federal agencies."

Projects the administration found objectionable include $100 million to secure Russian nuclear weapons and $315 million for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention construction, which the White House said could not possibly be spent this year.

The spending is for the remaining months of the federal fiscal year that runs through Sept. 30.

Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, top Republican on the Appropriations Committee and co-author of the bill, called the veto threat "just a tactic of the administration."

"We'll work this out" by the time a compromise bill is finished, he said.

Other fights also are likely, with the administration opposing:

-A provision making Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge's job one that requires Senate confirmation. Byrd has been feuding with Ridge over the White House's refusal to let him testify to Congress.

-Language requiring Bush to release $34 million in aid for overseas family planning efforts by the United Nations. An administration team recently returned from China, where it investigated conservative charges that U.N.-affiliated agencies help forced abortions and sterilizations there.

15 posted on 06/06/2002 5:09:37 AM PDT by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson