Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just another Joe
has one of the strictest anti-smoking laws but the deaths from "passive smoking" are higher than normal?

This is such a crock! I have worked in cancer clinical trials and cancer data. I want these people to tell us how they came to the conclusion that these deaths were caused by "passive smoking" as opposed to other genetic, environmental, occupational hazards or random occurrences

6 posted on 05/02/2002 11:15:24 AM PDT by scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: scholar
I want these people to tell us how they came to the conclusion that these deaths were caused by "passive smoking" as opposed to other genetic, environmental, occupational hazards or random occurrences.

Would be nice, huh?
Maybe they do like the US antis do and figure that if you've EVER been exposed to "passive smoking" and then you die, it MUST have been a "passive smoking" death.

8 posted on 05/02/2002 11:21:56 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: scholar
This is such a crock! I have worked in cancer clinical trials and cancer data. I want these people to tell us how they came to the conclusion that these deaths were caused by "passive smoking" as opposed to other genetic, environmental, occupational hazards or random occurrences

Thank you - this needs repeating.

18 posted on 05/02/2002 3:25:21 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: scholar
scholar, has anyone here attempted to enlist your aid in this fight against shoddy science and corrupt politicians? You know more than the rest of us (although we've been forced to get an edumacation, whether we wanted it or not) about how to "parse" this crap.

Here's a good example of idiocy from today's Bangor Daily News:

Dr. Erik Steele’s Channel 5 News discussion of teen-agers’ sleep habits on April 23 did not tell the whole story.

Children who live with parents who smoke in their homes are breathing massive amounts of toxic pollution, which makes them drowsy and lethargic, and brings on headaches.

Federal standards allow somewhere between zero and 100 parts per million of carbon monoxide as tolerable, but tobacco smoke contains 42,000 parts per million. Bigger kids who don’t smoke probably stay out of those homes as much as possible. Schoolchildren cannot think clearly enough in that atmosphere to do their homework properly, and feel less like doing it. Chemically impaired children in those homes are apt to sleep longer and be harder to wake up.

Ray Perkins Jr.
Founder and president Mid-Coast Maine Promotion
“For Clean Indoor Air”
Waldoboro

26 posted on 05/02/2002 8:16:09 PM PDT by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson