Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House passes election-year expansion in farm subsidies
Associated Press / SFGate

Posted on 05/02/2002 10:28:14 AM PDT by RCW2001

PHILIP BRASHER, AP Farm Writer
Thursday, May 2, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/05/02/financial1315EDT0146.DTL

(05-02) 10:15 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

The House on Thursday passed an election-year farm bill that will boost spending by 70 percent and increase subsidies to grain and cotton farms while adding thousands of other producers to the federal dole.

Shortly before the 280-141 vote, President Bush said the legislation wasn't everything he wanted but will "help ensure the immediate and long-term viability of our farm economy." A Senate vote was likely later Thursday.

The bill marks the reversal of the market-oriented policy of the 1996 Freedom to Farm law that was supposed to wean farmers from government subsidies.

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/02/2002 10:28:14 AM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
more...

The administration's support for the bill is a "complete flip-flop" from its earlier criticism of farm subsidies, said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group.

In a 120-page policy statement last fall, the administration said the subsdies stimulate excess production, inflate land rents and largely benefit a relatively small number of big farms. Economists say the new bill does little to address those complaints.

The bill's increased subsidies have angered foreign competitors. The European Union said Thursday it was considering challenging the payments before the World Trade Organization. Under WTO limits, certain U.S. farm subsidies cannot exceed $19.1 billion annually.

"The United States is increasing trade-distorting support for (American) farmers that will harm developing countries. This is what we are fiercely opposed to," EU spokesman Gregor Kreuzhuber.

Canada's agriculture minister, Lyle Vanclief, said the higher subsidies wee a "serious blow to the U.S.'s crediblity" to negotiate lower international trade barriers

2 posted on 05/02/2002 10:29:22 AM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I can't believe it.
3 posted on 05/02/2002 10:30:41 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
more...

(05-02) 10:16 PDT (AP) --

"We all know that Freedom to Farm didn't work," said Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo. "While no farmer wants to depend on the government for anything, it is critical that we provide a safety net to our producers."

The bill would authorize $180 billion in spending over the next 10 years, a $73.5 billion increase over existing programs. The legislation provides new payments for everything from milk and lentils to honey and wool.

Also, there is an 80 percent increase in land-conservation programs that will benefit livestock farms and fruit and vegetable growers who have historically received little federal cash.

The bill would pump billions of dollars into the economies of Plains and Southern states that are critical for Republicans. It has been praised by groups including the National Milk Producers Federation, United Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Association and the American Farm Bureau Federation.

4 posted on 05/02/2002 10:31:27 AM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
...adding thousands of other producers to the federal dole.

Odd choice of terms. Generally speaking, "producers" shouldn't need to be on the dole. Well, as long as the agri-giants,...er...I mean family farmers, get their fair share of tax dollars.

5 posted on 05/02/2002 10:33:53 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Freedom to Farm didn't work

It was never implemented so I assume Herr Congressman was referring to 'democracy' and central control that failed.

6 posted on 05/02/2002 10:34:06 AM PDT by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001
The House on Thursday passed an election-year farm bill that will boost spending by 70 percent and increase subsidies to grain and cotton farms while adding thousands of other producers to the federal dole.

yeah, if we all just stick together and vote for the gop, then we can work on changing it.....

Big government, big farm welfare, thanks gop leadership!

8 posted on 05/02/2002 10:41:26 AM PDT by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightuvu
I'm speechless. They do this at the same time the administration is asking for an increase in the debt ceiling because revenues are lagging?
9 posted on 05/02/2002 10:41:46 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
It's heartwarming to see those "smaller government" Republicans hard at work keeping us safe from the "tax and spend" Democrats.
10 posted on 05/02/2002 12:02:08 PM PDT by houston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: houston1
And people wonder why anyone would vote for a third party candidate.
11 posted on 05/02/2002 12:17:52 PM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rightuvu; BikerNYC; WhiteGuy; houston1
Concurring bump...
12 posted on 05/02/2002 12:44:49 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Please remind me how Republicans are supposed to be for smaller government. For some reason, I keep forgetting...
13 posted on 05/02/2002 1:00:33 PM PDT by Rule of Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rule of Law
From a later AP story:

Shortly before the 280-141 vote, President Bush said the legislation wasn't everything he wanted but will "help ensure the immediate and long-term viability of our farm economy." The Senate is expected to vote on the bill Tuesday, Democratic leaders said.

14 posted on 05/02/2002 1:04:55 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
President Bush said the legislation wasn't everything he wanted

Is it too late to get a recount in Florida?

The GOP-rank and file would have screamed if Gore did this. There might have even been a chance at stopping him. But they'll blindly support Bush no matter what he does.

15 posted on 05/02/2002 1:19:35 PM PDT by Rule of Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Hmmm ... so there is supposed to be a safety net for producers? Well, I produce money in a finance company. Where is my safety net?
16 posted on 05/02/2002 3:44:48 PM PDT by kemathen7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
As many said on the Election Bandwagon ---"Let's Get Him Elected! Then We'll Hold His Feet to the Fire!"

OoooKay.

17 posted on 05/02/2002 4:56:56 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
Like they said many times, "Better Bush than Gore". Which one won?
18 posted on 05/02/2002 4:58:22 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: infowars
Bush is turning into being as much of a spender as his old man, Depressing.
20 posted on 05/02/2002 8:07:36 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson