[blackdog]

So what good would money do in a continent that has no food? Why not send food instead of money. Keep the cash in plain sight. African nations have no interest whatsoever in feeding their peasantry.Common People are a commodity they gladly piss away. The current Marxist goal is to walk that fine line that keeps aide flowing(cash)and to cull the herd, while appearing to be concerned internationally.

In Africa people are an expense, not an asset. One does not insure an expense.

[linn37]

I have no problem with giving food,the money is another thing.I won't support giving money to any of the African countrys that are running off the whites,screw em.

[Calvin Locke]

So what good would money do in a continent that has no food? Why not send food instead of money.

Let'em starve. What are their cohorts in the surronding countries going to do? Trash the US in the UN?
What's different about that? They're the ones that are going to feel the effects of mass migration due to
starvation. Let them deal with the upheaval in the country later, or deal with corrupt regime in
Zimbabwe now. Their choice, since anything by the west other than cash is "colonial/imperialism."

Then maybe, just maybe, the US will help out.

BTB, Nixon sold wheat at a market discount to the Soviet Union, who then sold it to India at a profit.

And your point about the money in plain site being????