Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Farm State Pig-Out
WSJ Online ^ | May 2, 2002 | WSJ Editorial

Posted on 05/01/2002 11:03:18 PM PDT by edsheppa

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:46:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

That great rooting, snooting noise you hear in the distance, dear taxpayers, is the sound of election-year, farm-state politics rolling out of the U.S. Congress. We all know democracy isn't cheap, but this is ridiculous.

Senate and House conferees this week unveiled their final farm bill, a 10-year, $173.5 billion bucket of slop that has even Washington agog. By the time all the handouts and payoffs were complete, the well-fed conferees had agreed to increase agricultural spending by no less than 70%. This alone amounts to one of the greatest urban-to-rural wealth transfers in history, a sort of Farm Belt Great Society.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: farmsubsidy
Sickening.
1 posted on 05/01/2002 11:03:18 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
" Of $71 billion handed out to farmers over the past five years, two-thirds went to just 10% of the farms."

And there is the main problem. Ted Turner is the top #3rd or 4th recipient of subsidies. Something is very wrong here. The small farmer just gets screwed in the process and fat cats collect.

2 posted on 05/02/2002 7:43:05 AM PDT by cibco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cibco
This bill is a disgrace and a blatant violation of Republican principles, if such a thing could even be said to exist. I have been waiting for someone to point this out. The Republicans cannot ever say that they are for limited government. They destroyed what they fought so hard to gain not six years ago. I expect this from Bush - he never said he was for limited government, and never promised to fundamentally change the relationship of our government to its people. But the conservatives in the Congress and Senate? There is no excuse.
3 posted on 05/02/2002 8:01:37 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
bump
4 posted on 05/02/2002 9:12:31 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
I'm sure glad I'm not paying for this.
5 posted on 05/02/2002 9:16:21 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
"We did it with steel, we did it with lumber, and now we're turning to our allies and saying we're doing it again with farm," laments Representative John Boehner (R., Ohio), along with California Democrat Cal Dooley, a rare dissenter from the spending consensus.

Now that Congress has us all paying higher prices for steel products, wood products, and farm products, they are considering having taxpayers fund steelworker pensions and insurance coverage of terrorist attacks -- and the President is joining in on this gluttony!

6 posted on 05/02/2002 9:42:43 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson