Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MizSterious
(meaning porn pics) Why are they entered into evidence?
223 posted on 05/03/2002 8:54:18 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~;MizSterious;FresnoDA
Tainting the jury pool, most importantly though, to create a motive, which they have not been able to prove. David had an apparent fondness for well endowed, EXPERIENCED adult women. And he has a history of it.

I'm probably the first one who brought up the ex-brother-in-law (X-BIL). Remember, you didn't know what x-bil meant. Besides, the media would have uncovered that he was in the military. They didn't because he wasn't. I doubt very seriously given the sensationalism involved, that the media would have seen fit to sweep an AWOL charge under the carpet like they did for Clinton.

227 posted on 05/03/2002 9:12:34 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson