[Freedom2specul8]

I can't remember why I brought it up today..but mizs asked me a question..and that's why I replied. Yes, it doesn't have the "porn" in the highlighted part..but later portions of the testimony do refer to porn..at some point it says less than 100 appeared to be under 18. I've gotta go for now things to do.

21 TO THEM, WHICH WOULD ALTER IT. WE SCANNED THROUGH

22 IT, AND MR. YOUNGFLESH SAW WHAT HE FELT -- WHAT HE

23 REFERRED TO AS QUESTIONABLE IMAGES.

24 Q WHICH MEANS WHAT?

25 A WHICH MEANS IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS -- IT HAD

26 DEPICTIONS OF PEOPLE UNDER THE AGE OF 18 THAT WERE

27 EITHER CLOTHED OR PARTIALLY -- I'M SORRY. NAKED OR

28 PARTIALLY NAKED. AND WHO WERE EITHER ENGAGED IN

1 SEXUAL ACTS OR IN SEXUAL POSES, THAT SORT OF THING.

[MizSterious]

"at some point it says less than 100 appeared to be under 18."

Kim, pretty please, READ THE BLEEPIN' TRANSCRIPTS? It says no such thing. It says less than 100 of the images were questionable. It says NONE of the images were child porn. Sheesh.