To: Politicalmom
same link: MR. DUSEK: THEY APPLY TO COUNT 3 AND THEY WILL
6 ALSO INDICATE MOTIVE FOR WHY HE DID WHAT HE DID.
7 THE COURT: I UNDERSTAND THE MOTIVE. I
8 UNDERSTAND THAT.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Your quote still does not prove that all 67,000 images were porn. Please re-read the transcript, including the portions you've quoted. Especially those portions. Do not put words in their mouths. Read them for what they are. They say images, not porn images. They describe what I call the "gross 100" in some detail, as delicately as they can, but they also say that of the 67,000 - 68,000 images, less than one hundred might be questionable. And of those, none (i.e., zilch, nada, zero, goose-egg, nuttin') are kiddie porn.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson