To: *Old_North_State; **North_Carolina; mykdsmom; ncweaver; ncpastor; Howlin; Pamlico; kachina...
NC Ping!
To: ALL
Sorry to post and run, but I've got to get home for dinner.
Will check in later tonight.
To: Constitution Day
The Supreme Court decision will require that counties be divided into single-member districts, crossing county lines only to protect minority voting strength in the 40 counties covered under the Voting Rights Act or to balance district population totals How exactly do they protect "minority voting strength"? If an inner city has say 10,000 residents do they lump that in with a couple of suburbs which would have a population roughly equal to 10,000?
6 posted on
04/30/2002 3:25:36 PM PDT by
Dianna
To: torie;crasher;freetheusa;fishoutofwater;doggone
Two Democrats -- Sarah Parker and G.K. Butterfield -- dissented....I AM SHOCKED...........I bet the Superior Ct ends up drawing the NC state house and senate maps.
7 posted on
04/30/2002 4:14:48 PM PDT by
KQQL
To: Constitution Day
Courts have doing a lot of that in a lot of states recently -- including Pennsylvania. One more bit of Slick's legacy.
9 posted on
04/30/2002 4:19:30 PM PDT by
Tribune7
To: Constitution Day
Good ruling! Now if we could just get the rediculously gerrymandered US congressional districts eliminated, like the Mel Watt district that followsed a narrow corridor up I-85.
To: Constitution Day
So the Voting Rights Act overrules the U.S. Constitution? Is that what the dems are saying?
To: Constitution Day
Maybe I'm dense as a post, but I don't understand why it's so hard to draw the districts to fit the Constitution.
I know there are "target" population numbers that you have to get close to for each district, but how strict does it need to be? Just split the big counties into small districts (as opposed to the large multi-member districts) and let the small counties stand alone. The numbers are never going to be perfect anyway. One county may have a better ratio than the next, but that's always going to be the case. That's why we redraw the maps.
The only wrench in this type of simple plan is the "minority majority" district requirement. That's a Constitutional (State and Federal) abomination in itself.
JWinNC
20 posted on
05/01/2002 9:31:28 AM PDT by
JWinNC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson